Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
94. Do I approve? You really want to try that?
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 06:08 AM
Aug 2012

Jack, while I'm glad that you and all the other generationally over-privileged white kids have finally discovered police brutality, you might not want to try to use it for every occasion. Just because someone thinks more could be getting done on the part of the protestors, does not mean that they are a supporter of that sort of brutality. it's a false dichotomy you're erecting there, Jack. "Fer us er agin' us" is as fucking stupid coming from you as it is coming from GWB. Don't use that tactic, it makes you look ignorant.

Don't call my comments insulting to movements that you very clearly do not understand, Jack. I can forgive you; they really don't teach this stuff in school (they never have; can't have kids learning about the blacks or the reds, after all!) but you need to understand... the civil rights movement, women's suffrage, the labor movement... these were not born out of people drumming in a fucking park. They came out of action. Both the civil rights and suffrage movements were born out of more litigation than you can imagine. The labor movement was born of workers doing what they felt necessary to secure their rights. All three involves intense political lobbying to get their favored politicians into office (or at least to get their enemies OUT), all three relied heavily on the power of the ballot to secure and protect what htye had and press for more.

And when the cops, the pinkertons, the assholes your dumb ass is trying to accuse me of supporting came out to stop them... did these "fighters for justice" (to use your term) meekly fold up and go home? They might have fled for that day, sure, nobody's going to stick around for an asskicking. But they come back. The men and women in prison keep on struggling - have you ever read "Letter from a Birmingham Jail"? I assure you, the title isn't a metaphor.

But what I see these days, is increasingly a "movement" that doesn't do a whole lot of moving... unless the police tell them to, and then it's all about tugging those forelocks and scurrying off. I see ignorant kids much like yourself rolling their eyes about the notion of becoming politically involved, because, like, that's what the man wants, man.

Like I said, I support the goals of the occupy movement... I think a lot of hte people in it are useless cocks, but I support the goals. My fear is that this movement will end up like the hippies - stagnant and useless, accomplishing nothing becuase the participants refused to do anything, and instead hoped that a lot of posturing and bad singing would magically make things better.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Really? I don't think they made any difference at all 1-Old-Man Aug 2012 #1
What do they say when you're at Tea Party rallies? UnrepentantLiberal Aug 2012 #2
It doesn't matter if people know who they are or not - that bottom line jillan Aug 2012 #4
I agree with you 100% Voice for Peace Aug 2012 #41
It's possible that it had a greater effect on politicians CJCRANE Aug 2012 #6
That may be true, but I think there is a sign that it is not 1-Old-Man Aug 2012 #24
Are you saying that all those hours I spent at Occupy Los Angeles (and coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #8
Yes, out here in the country you weren't even a blip on the radar 1-Old-Man Aug 2012 #22
What does 'in the country' refer to? A rural setting? I ask coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #26
You know, flyover country. UnrepentantLiberal Aug 2012 #30
Yes, northeastern WV, about a two hour drive to DC 1-Old-Man Aug 2012 #57
I live in the country, too. Zorra Aug 2012 #31
And there are some very good Occupy movements UnrepentantLiberal Aug 2012 #33
Out there in the country is probably Republican territory anyway. JDPriestly Aug 2012 #54
Spot on. raouldukelives Aug 2012 #70
Thanks. That's great news. JDPriestly Aug 2012 #73
So you think tax equality would be an issue without OWS uponit7771 Aug 2012 #34
LOL there's no way to RATIONALLY believe that tax equality would be an issue without OWS. Zalatix Aug 2012 #89
That's strange, because all polls taken on OWS showed that over 80% had heard of them sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #49
Blame your media, I can tell you right now nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #97
Whatever happened to that big spring surprise you promised us? zappaman Aug 2012 #98
Occupy was also international. CJCRANE Aug 2012 #3
The movement could only be ignored for so long by M$M nc4bo Aug 2012 #7
Hmmm salinen Aug 2012 #5
Weimar had proportional representation in its Reichstag. U.S. has 'winner take all' coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #10
Could you please explain this point in very simple terms? I don't get it.... (nt) philly_bob Aug 2012 #14
Um, in the Weimar Republic a poltiical party needed to only secure about coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #21
It is a myth that proportional representation had anything to do with the Nazis taking power. JackRiddler Aug 2012 #61
Proportional representation had something to do with the Nazis taking power, as Hitler would not coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #65
The Nazis were largest party in both 1932 parliamentary elections (July & November) JackRiddler Aug 2012 #68
Your point is valid for a hypothetical winner-take-all system with multiple viable parties. I might coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #71
Thanks, Coalition and Riddler, for interesting (if opposed) replies. (nt) philly_bob Aug 2012 #72
When the Nazis first came to power the Social Democrats and Communist had a combined majority. Puregonzo1188 Aug 2012 #75
Amen My Friend... KharmaTrain Aug 2012 #17
But the Baggers are not a 'movement'. They were a creation of big money interests sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #50
The Weimar Republic lasted less than 15 years RZM Aug 2012 #53
We get it. Give OWS a gold medal. randome Aug 2012 #9
LOL! You are definitely going to hold the DU record for most anti-Occupy posts by a country mile. Zorra Aug 2012 #36
nonsense. yes, coining the one percent line distilled the cali Aug 2012 #11
Your argument is an exercise in SHEER DENIAL. Zalatix Aug 2012 #23
No, my argument is factual. cali Aug 2012 #25
Your argument is as factual as Mitt Romney is a leftist. Zalatix Aug 2012 #29
wow. couldn't possibly argue with that brilliant gem cali Aug 2012 #37
Well hey at least my arguments don't come from Bizarro Land Zalatix Aug 2012 #42
Which of the following is true: onenote Aug 2012 #46
OWS has pushed a number of Dems to the left. Zalatix Aug 2012 #48
The people who turn up at Democratic Club meetings are the same ones JDPriestly Aug 2012 #55
I don't see any facts. Quantify them. nt Union Scribe Aug 2012 #76
OWS has helped bring together people to help those being illegally thrown out of their homes... midnight Aug 2012 #12
The tea party was sponsored by Fox News. Blanks Aug 2012 #16
I agree... midnight Aug 2012 #60
Yes, the Occupy Caucus in Congress has really accomplished so much! frazzled Aug 2012 #13
Frazzled you make an impressive point... I'm wondering if that list would not be so long if not for midnight Aug 2012 #64
But OWS has no intention of working inside government frazzled Aug 2012 #67
My humble suggestion-keep reading what you can about OWS. It is a world wide movement regardless if midnight Aug 2012 #78
how many OWS representatives have been elected? NightWatcher Aug 2012 #15
The teabaggers are heavily funded by the Koch Bros and more. OWS does not have the $ behind jillan Aug 2012 #18
sure, but that doesn't make the claim in your op any more accurate cali Aug 2012 #19
OWS never intended to become politicians. UnrepentantLiberal Aug 2012 #32
The fact is, Democrats are supposed to represent OWS. Zorra Aug 2012 #40
Even my Republican friends throw around "the 1%" Patiod Aug 2012 #20
Has the OWS movement figured out how to balance the budget? Southerner Aug 2012 #27
that's an absurd non-sequitur cali Aug 2012 #28
Yes. Zorra Aug 2012 #38
Yes. Blanks Aug 2012 #69
for the first time in a generation - OWS made the subject of inequitable distribution of wealth a Douglas Carpenter Aug 2012 #35
i agree samsingh Aug 2012 #39
OWS is 'movement' politics while Teat Party is electoral politics. TahitiNut Aug 2012 #43
You exaggerate their value and "success" kctim Aug 2012 #44
Gotta disagree. Beautiful concept. Disastrous execution. Tarheel_Dem Aug 2012 #45
1+ patrice Aug 2012 #80
No, and drop the fantasy. One side mobilized and elected 60+ people to congress, the other side cecilfirefox Aug 2012 #47
There is no comparison between a real Grassroots, International Social Justice movement sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #51
"The Tea Party" is an old, old part of the Republican Party... JackRiddler Aug 2012 #63
So how many congressmen/women in their caucus? badtoworse Aug 2012 #52
Electoral politics by itself has given us a congress.. Teamster Jeff Aug 2012 #58
That's pretty difficult to argue RZM Aug 2012 #56
Well, Obama hasn't told us to eat our peas in a while DerekG Aug 2012 #59
Indeed. And "Teabagger Movement" is a laugh in itself. JackRiddler Aug 2012 #62
Yep, woo me with science Aug 2012 #84
I'm one of the guys that decry OWS as a waste of potential. MrSlayer Aug 2012 #66
So get out there and show them how to do it. JackRiddler Aug 2012 #74
Every time I've seen an interview with an OWSer... Scootaloo Aug 2012 #81
That would be true if you didn't ignore what happened. JackRiddler Aug 2012 #82
And why are they bowing their heads to that authority? Scootaloo Aug 2012 #85
Go out and lead the charge, tough one. JackRiddler Aug 2012 #92
By the way, are you comparing today's US urban police to Bull Connor? JackRiddler Aug 2012 #93
Do I approve? You really want to try that? Scootaloo Aug 2012 #94
I do appreciate the part where I'm a kid! Thanks! JackRiddler Aug 2012 #95
+100! zappaman Aug 2012 #96
I tried. I got crickets. MrSlayer Aug 2012 #87
Lol @ how HARD some push against Union Scribe Aug 2012 #77
OWS & President Obama!!! That's hilarious. The single biggest trait of OWS has been Obama hate. patrice Aug 2012 #79
Before I call bullshit, I'll ask a question to be sure... JackRiddler Aug 2012 #83
I'll be honest - I don't understand fainaent Aug 2012 #86
First of all, Welcome to DU. jillan Aug 2012 #88
Ah, I see... fainaent Aug 2012 #91
No, the OWS movement became an unfocused mess without force CabCurious Aug 2012 #90
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OWS has meant just as muc...»Reply #94