Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

CincyDem

(7,399 posts)

2. I guess I never understand the logic of this kind of stuff...

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Oct 2, 2018, 05:16 PM

Oct 2018

...the fact that she chooses to be sexually active in her mid/late 20's must mean that she wasn't assaulted in her late teens.

So, the only possible conclusion is that any woman who has been assaulted must join the convent if she thinks she might one day come out to her community and name her assailant.

I just don't get the thought process.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Senate Judiciary Committee releases letter discounting Julie Swetnick's accustions [View all] brooklynite Oct 2018 OP

un-fucking-believable. kennetha Oct 2018 #1

I guess I never understand the logic of this kind of stuff... CincyDem Oct 2018 #2

Good lord that sounds like one of those fake letters to Croney Oct 2018 #3

If Julie Swetnick was a psychological mess with such a dubious past, The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #4

Not to pee in the cornflakes, hughee99 Oct 2018 #11

Federal judges don't need them. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #12

Kavanaugh had a top secret security clearance as a part of his employment in the Bush White House. Calista241 Oct 2018 #13

I call bullshit. sheshe2 Oct 2018 #5

Pfft, it hardly discounts her accusations SkipG Oct 2018 #6

WTF does this purport to say about Julie Swetnick?????? nt LAS14 Oct 2018 #7

Avenatti: triron Oct 2018 #8

+1 dalton99a Oct 2018 #9

She testified under oath flotsam Oct 2018 #10

I think you are confusing her with somebody else. LisaL Oct 2018 #14