General Discussion

Kaleva

(40,365 posts)

9. Yes, when will you learn.

Reply to CharleyDog (Reply #6)

Tue Oct 2, 2018, 06:32 PM

Oct 2018

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Well, we got played again. If we hadn't been so excited and immediately jumped in glee [View all] Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 OP

Just heard on Michelangelo Signorile MontanaMama Oct 2018 #1

Yup and no Dr Ford. I would give anything Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #11

There is a WSJ report that says IT COULD BE finished tonight or tomorrow morning according Hoyt Oct 2018 #32

If by "we" you mean democrats...we didn't have any say it it. Merlot Oct 2018 #2

Right its called MATH--51-3 Equals 48 Which is less than 50 Stallion Oct 2018 #4

well, I thought (foolishly) that a FBI investigation would mean an actual CharleyDog Oct 2018 #6

Yes, when will you learn. Kaleva Oct 2018 #9

Yes...it's hard to think re-thug when a natural Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #13

I know, we have no power....but millions were watching that moment - and DiFi Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #21

Hot damn, you are good at what you do! ZZenith Oct 2018 #3

Sorry didn't mean to do that. But you are 100% Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #16

the FBI gets bdamomma Oct 2018 #5

So is the vote tomorrow? torius Oct 2018 #7

Can't happen that fast unless Democrats play along FBaggins Oct 2018 #15

Are you referring to committee or floor? Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #18

Floor FBaggins Oct 2018 #29

Oh - just assumed that the committee would reconvene to examine FBI Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #36

Oh. The FBI knows and can prove he lied under oath many times Freethinker65 Oct 2018 #8

But was that in their scope? proving he lied? Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #22

It is absolutely provable that he took an oath to tell the truth, and he did NOT tell the truth. Cracklin Charlie Oct 2018 #10

In a sane world... Garrett78 Oct 2018 #34

And, it has never been clearer - clear like mud - we are playing fair and they Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #37

That was the plan all along! We really aren't being played. We just don't have the Kajun Gal Oct 2018 #12

You are probably right - it was incredibly odd that after announced (the weak week investigation) Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #19

Saw a lady on Ari Melber, republican back in 2015, email got hacked. People forget that Kajun Gal Oct 2018 #24

I work from home with the news on in the background all day. I hear everything Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #39

Not sure if Trump was originally behind the hack. He isn't that smart. I think Russia Kajun Gal Oct 2018 #43

But, he likely was the recipient, right? This is totally under-reported - what happened Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #45

Not from NOLA. NOLA isn't NOLA anymore since Katrina. But all these hacks on both Kajun Gal Oct 2018 #49

And yes, Trump most definitely was a recipient! Kajun Gal Oct 2018 #50

Yes, Trump was a recipient, I'm quite sure. Kajun Gal Oct 2018 #51

Read NancyGregg latest post... Kajun Gal Oct 2018 #53

There are many on the Left who are prone to irrational exuberance elocs Oct 2018 #14

Good points..it just gets old - and tiresome always doing contortions - like Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #23

In 2016 the election in the Senate was just the opposite of what it is now elocs Oct 2018 #26

Yup. Nate's got us at only 30% chance. Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #27

Schmidt of the NYT helped with the misleading news that the scope was expanded. triron Oct 2018 #17

You are right. And I got false hope from former FBI on TV. I remember one saying Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #20

The FBI is signalling they were handcuffed by the WH SuprstitionAintthWay Oct 2018 #25

Know for a fact the NYC FBI loves Trump. They were the ones who did not respond Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #40

NYC FBI agents' role in 2016 SuprstitionAintthWay Oct 2018 #47

I have been meaning to dig back to find the interview - maybe you have heard Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #61

Nobody I know Codeine Oct 2018 #28

It is far from over and out vlyons Oct 2018 #30

you guys are still on a learning curve... jodymarie aimee Oct 2018 #31

Is it that we got played sarisataka Oct 2018 #33

The three "eyewitnesses" pintobean Oct 2018 #35

I don't remember small gatherings from 36 years ago that were uneventful for me, either. SuprstitionAintthWay Oct 2018 #38

And she said it wasn't even a party - but a "pre-party" gathering - so no - you likely Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #42

The bottom line is the same pintobean Oct 2018 #56

You're probably right. Hard to squelch "autopilot" optimism and belief that things Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #41

Not so much cynical sarisataka Oct 2018 #54

I never heard anyone "immediately, when it was announced it was criticized and Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #58

Didn't fool me Sugarcoated Oct 2018 #44

sometimes it's not good to know so much. Maybe it would be better to be one Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #46

The FBI is investigating Trump directly so I would not say so at all. Fred Sanders Oct 2018 #52

Was the WH going to listen to the demands of Democrats though? JHan Oct 2018 #48

it was always a long shot to stop the nomination bigtree Oct 2018 #55

I agree - but I always look at things like - things could be better - we could be in Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #59

This is all on you... lame54 Oct 2018 #57

???? Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #60