Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

john657

(1,058 posts)

6. Yes,

Reply to Laura PourMeADrink (Reply #3)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 09:36 AM

Oct 2018

2/3 or 67 votes needed in the Senate to convict and remove.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wow. New Jennifer Rubin tweets on Kavanaugh coverup, motions to recuse, and impeachment [View all] highplainsdem Oct 2018 OP

House impeaches, Senates refuses to convict, voters grumble that nobody's addressing their needs... brooklynite Oct 2018 #1

m$m says both sides, tribalism, repugs on sunday talk shows Hermit-The-Prog Oct 2018 #2

You're right. Let's keep letting it slide. Maven Oct 2018 #5

None of the candidates I've talked to say that voters have Trump and Kavanaugh on their minds... brooklynite Oct 2018 #7

Then they are either monumentally bad at politics or stunningly out of touch. Maven Oct 2018 #9

The voters i know can walk and chew gum...and they are aware of all of it. Crutchez_CuiBono Oct 2018 #12

Yup, if candidates encounter voters who don't care, it's an opportunity to educate. JHan Oct 2018 #21

The voters I know sure do! marybourg Oct 2018 #10

This canard again? ZZenith Oct 2018 #38

You have a knack today for being first commentator but with only disparaging words OhNo-Really Oct 2018 #13

Not interesting in winning a public opinion war... brooklynite Oct 2018 #17

I see your point; however, public opinion sways elections. OhNo-Really Oct 2018 #19

Why must it be impeachment not indictment? Fiendish Thingy Oct 2018 #20

This is such nonsense and I'm tired of it. Maven Oct 2018 #34

this Grasswire2 Oct 2018 #22

You know what? There's NOTHING wrong with putting that black mark on his record calimary Oct 2018 #33

The constitution doesn't address impeachment rules for a SC judge, does it? Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #3

Yes, john657 Oct 2018 #6

Just watch his drinking while the court is in session. greymattermom Oct 2018 #4

won't happen....... getagrip_already Oct 2018 #27

Rubin is right, KavaCrookeds big mouth should mean a crap ton of recusing of him from cases uponit7771 Oct 2018 #8

I've gained a ton of respect for Jennifer Rubin DeminPennswoods Oct 2018 #11

We'd never do it because of fear of what Republican's would do once they were back in power. jalan48 Oct 2018 #14

We can't let them return to power. delisen Oct 2018 #23

then this "we" you speak of must be shown the door, pronto. Grasswire2 Oct 2018 #24

Totally agree, that's where this is headed bucolic_frolic Oct 2018 #15

no, only the senate does..... getagrip_already Oct 2018 #29

Yes exactly vlyons Oct 2018 #16

"there will shit load of investigations" FiveGoodMen Oct 2018 #35

So much damage will be done in one year Perseus Oct 2018 #18

True. that is why we are now engaged in a Civil War. delisen Oct 2018 #25

Elie Wiesel said it. Grasswire2 Oct 2018 #26

Yes it does grantcart Oct 2018 #31

Kavanaugh effectively vowed under oath to the Senate to be a partisan hack Freethinker65 Oct 2018 #28

"The institutions are holding." cilla4progress Oct 2018 #30

So what if the traitorous Senate refuses to convict? watoos Oct 2018 #32

K&R Scurrilous Oct 2018 #36

Kick dalton99a Oct 2018 #37