We Have Pubic Hair for a Reason

[naturallyselected]

271. Couple of other thoughts

In this long fascinating thread, there are a couple of things I haven't seen addressed.

1) If any of you have ever caught the syndicated TV show "The Doctors", the female doctor on the panel, an OB/GYN, frequently speaks on favor of pubic hair removal, saying that she has noticed in her practice, that the hair removers tend to be much less prone to vaginal infections. My wife's general practitioner says the same thing, even confiding i my wife that she does it too.

2) This pre-pubescent thing - I can understand why it pisses many off. Having a daughter, I have changed many a diaper, and anyone who has seen a hairless female child and a hairless woman must realize that you don't need hair to tell the difference. I am a very visual person, and I like a nice clear view of the very womanly parts, as well as the feel of soft skin around the area I so enjoy pleasuring. Without getting too graphic, my partner keeps some nicely trimmed hair "above", but gets rid of the hair "below", and that works just fine. However, I prefer hairy pits on women - there's nothing to "see" underneath, and I love the soft furry feel and, yes, the smell of a clean yet furry armpit - but my wife prefers to get rid of that as well, at least in the summer. A good thing about winter, I get to enjoy the womanly furry pits.

So, there is some support even from the medical world, and there are definite visual reasons for liking the area bare that have nothing to do with preferring the "pre-pubescent" look.