Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
19. If you invest time you'll eventually see he spins to protect Republican.
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 07:00 PM
Oct 2018

Last edited Wed Oct 10, 2018, 07:37 PM - Edit history (1)

I first realized when he -- and those chosen for his panels -- protected both Comey and McCabe against any suggestion that they did something wrong and treated them both as innocent victims. The day McCabe was fired, over the entire hour they never mentioned that the FBI's own internal ethical investigation department and the OIG both investigated him immediately after an action and both recommended he be fired. Of course Williams and company didn't mention the action that immediately triggered the investigations.

Today he deliberately claimed at length that the media and government gave all the warning and did all they could for the people living in the panhandle and inland areas.

This was AFTER General whatshisface in charge of Katrina disaster said they could and should have done more and pointed out his worry about the welfare of people in vulnerable housing and also pointed out that, even if warning of a rapidly growing storm were given, shelters hadn't been opened for those in vulnerable housing. This was also after Williams himself mentioned the possibility of shear forces diminishing Michael's strength -- but strictly to knock down any idea that the possibility that they wouldn't should be considered. All were attempts to excuse away why adequate warnings and other preparations weren't done, even as the eye was moving over the panhandle and we had no idea what was happening to the people there. He repeated all this later while I was listening also.

The general responded professionally and briefly the first time, saying that when he was in charge all hurricanes were regarded as potential cat 4s. Not, as Williams was pretending was appropriate, cat 2s that "probably" wouldn't get worse.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What's wrong with him? He seems to doing a decent enough job. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #1
Don't care for him...he was never really held accountable for his lies HipChick Oct 2018 #2
Yep! Gotta watch Rachel! On CST here. This hurricane is a booger tho. Kajun Gal Oct 2018 #3
Probably a contract deal about whoever gets disaster coverage The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #4
At least he faced some consequences and never regaining "NIGHTLY NEWS" anchor was hlthe2b Oct 2018 #9
I like him! renate Oct 2018 #5
I like him, too. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #8
Yes.. he's always been polished and exceedingly competent for breaking news kind of coverage... hlthe2b Oct 2018 #10
He just right for his 11pm slot.. HipChick Oct 2018 #12
If you invest time you'll eventually see he spins to protect Republican. Hortensis Oct 2018 #19
You're not stuck: you can change the channel or turn off the TV brooklynite Oct 2018 #6
Not me malaise Oct 2018 #7
I turned already...Andrew blew me out of FL HipChick Oct 2018 #11
I like Brian Williams. He always gives props to panelists who've won Pulitzers, etc. VOX Oct 2018 #13
He was in Philly before he went National: PCIntern Oct 2018 #14
OMG...you hit the nail on the head..right there.. HipChick Oct 2018 #16
I'd like BriWi more if it weren't for his flowery language and his over-the-top Totally Tunsie Oct 2018 #15
Ugh, he's an actor Bradshaw3 Oct 2018 #17
Fox isn't covering it. They're humping you know who and demonizing Democrats. nolabear Oct 2018 #18
Surprised cuz the path is smack dab through the heart of red country. OH, duh, their Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2018 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I take it we are stuck wi...»Reply #19