General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: South Carolina Democrats: Better if Sanders 'got lost' (don't shoot the messanger, AP story) [View all]George II
(67,782 posts)However, if you "have no idea what the deal with the governorship is, but I don't know what or why you are implying what you are", you don't want to.
The FACT is, there is a Governor election in Vermont this year, with a ground breaking Democratic candidate, but Sanders' priority seems to be to campaign a thousand miles away for some undetermined candidates in South Carolina, and then in several other states.
It would seem to most politically aware people, and Democratic voters in Vermont (or any state), that a so-called prominent public official from that state (or any state) would be most interested in promoting the candidacies of major candidates in his/her own state first before promoting the candidacy of lesser importance in other states hundreds or thousands of miles from home.
Unless, of course, he/she isn't interested in who wins the election for Governor in his/her own state?
I know that MY Senator, who is up for re-election this year, is doing all he can to get elected once again AND get a Democratic Governor elected. One would hope that would be the case for ALL Democratic Senators in the country.
But.............................