Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sanders won't promise to serve full Senate term as he considers 2020 run [View all]Blue_true
(31,261 posts)134. I hope that he does not chum the water with democratic blood if he loses the nomination in 2020.
Everyone should be held to a pledge that they will absolutely support the 2020 Democratic Party nominee, and strongly encourage ALL of their supporters to do so.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
188 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sanders won't promise to serve full Senate term as he considers 2020 run [View all]
left-of-center2012
Oct 2018
OP
how? You think anybody else who might run should promise to serve their full senate term? I guess
JCanete
Oct 2018
#11
I don't know. So if Harris runs in 2020 you are going to say "this is so wrong"?
JCanete
Oct 2018
#38
you still have no argument here that makes any sense. Would you prefer an indie on the left to run
JCanete
Oct 2018
#101
your version of dem would have had you voting for lieberman over sanders squared off....soo
JCanete
Oct 2018
#106
how would he not "get" another shot? Actually, I think he'll sit out if Warren runs, but we'll see.
JCanete
Oct 2018
#143
In order to "get" another shot he'll have to pledge to become a Democrat and remain a Democrat....
George II
Oct 2018
#160
That's true, but that's all in his court. no body can stand in the way. He gets another
JCanete
Oct 2018
#161
Not that it's relevant to this discussion, but back when he last ran (2006, twelve years ago) ....
George II
Oct 2018
#121
no, but it makes no sense to me at all given that we knew who lieberman was already, whether
JCanete
Oct 2018
#141
Did Kamala Harris said that she wasn't sure if she wouldn't serve her full when she ran in 2016?
George II
Oct 2018
#117
The field just eyerolled ...and they ALL returned to the business of putting together a campaign
Bfd
Oct 2018
#36
Not really sure what your snark was about. Whether or not he has a chance is an entirely different
JCanete
Oct 2018
#40
I think you missed the context of my "field just got a lot smaller" statement. It was referring to
JCanete
Oct 2018
#43
Isn't that up to Vermonters? Did you have the same problem with Hillary Clinton in 2006?
karynnj
Oct 2018
#17
So it isnt about him being an independant or because he wont commit to a full term
Tiggeroshii
Oct 2018
#135
You nailed it! Bernie is not a dem. The DNC has already stated the will not support an outsider
Thekaspervote
Oct 2018
#94
yeah, good luck, the bar has shifted as to what the beef is. If you poke holes in a specific
JCanete
Oct 2018
#146
Bernie would need to run as a Dem to have any chance of winning. I don't see the Dems letting
jalan48
Oct 2018
#2
um....who are the dems. Kind of thought it was us. Kind of think, given how popular he is with dems
JCanete
Oct 2018
#12
Yeah, that's right. He ran with the Dem Party of Vermont's blessing, because this way we on the left
JCanete
Oct 2018
#50
what the hell are you talking about? I just laid out for you why he runs as a democrat,
JCanete
Oct 2018
#56
Sure if you want to define establishment your way. Its not the way I define it. It is counter to
JCanete
Oct 2018
#63
in what regard? How did I contradict myself? I may have been crappy at conveying my point, but
JCanete
Oct 2018
#76
Do you think he should have run in the GE as an independent? Answer honestly. nt
JCanete
Oct 2018
#85
I've explained why he ran as a democrat. If you think another way is viable for any of us, I'd
JCanete
Oct 2018
#88
I'd like to see him run as a Dem but I don't see it happening. Too much what happened for some.
jalan48
Oct 2018
#47
Yes, it's US, which includes the person you responded to, me, and many other registered Democrats.
George II
Oct 2018
#123
that's right, and if you haven't been paying attention, he is still popular among democrats. He may
JCanete
Oct 2018
#142
Most Democrats. that doesn't mean most will prefer him over another option in the Primary, but
JCanete
Oct 2018
#154
"Most" means more than any other, I don't think so. Where do you get that "most Democrats" from?
George II
Oct 2018
#157
No it doesn't. It just means most democrats actually like him. Look at the polling. The last one
JCanete
Oct 2018
#159
The only favorability ratings I've seen are of Senators/politicans from their own home states, not..
George II
Oct 2018
#162
that was the most recent one, sure, and in that thread I stated that the title was overplaying it.
JCanete
Oct 2018
#166
Not to mention, the media treats any potential President - no matter how unlikely -
karynnj
Oct 2018
#19
Most of the increase was from publishing, but the point is he increased his income by 500%
grantcart
Oct 2018
#61
Jimmy Carter has been a private citizen for 3.8 decades, how many books did he write....
George II
Oct 2018
#138
Same here. If Bernie wins our primary, I am 1000% behind him in the General.
Blue_true
Oct 2018
#133
I knew it! I don't understand how anyone who has been paying attention thoughgt
lunamagica
Oct 2018
#5
deep...what bullshit are you even referring to here? and why do you think its acceptable to bash
JCanete
Oct 2018
#13
Then state those facts and don't make me try to figure out what your point is. I agree Clinton was
JCanete
Oct 2018
#27
that's what primaries are for. Do you have a problem with primaries? Do you have a problem with
JCanete
Oct 2018
#33
Garr, what value is it accusing me of knowing or hiding somethign that you refuse to articulate?
JCanete
Oct 2018
#55
Establishment is not a smear. There is political machinery. There is a dogma that goes along with it
JCanete
Oct 2018
#59
ok, no idea what you're talking about. so benefitting from running as the anti-establishment
JCanete
Oct 2018
#77
hey lantern, haven't heard you pull the sacred cows out of your arsenal for a while now.
JCanete
Oct 2018
#73
Not many homeowners invite a guest back who's trashed the house once already.
LanternWaste
Oct 2018
#71
At 80, he can't promise, he'd wake up tomorrow, every day you wake up is a good day at 80....
sunonmars
Oct 2018
#20
True, but Ouch! I'n 82. Thanks for reminding me of my pending mortality..
justhanginon
Oct 2018
#125
Of course this is from The Hill. The other day their "false headline" said that Hillary was
still_one
Oct 2018
#31
Sanders or Hillary are NOT going to be the Democratic nominee. The truth is they represent
still_one
Oct 2018
#35
I love Bernie and I feel the same way. We need new blood. And I thik he is to old. But if it
zonkers
Oct 2018
#84
Sen. Sanders won't win a primary IMHO and I am not certain he will run anyway so he will serve
Demsrule86
Oct 2018
#98
Remember that TV show Columbo? And he'd have all these actors who were big once
Squinch
Oct 2018
#102
Had 2016 featured a bigger field of candidates it's unlikely he would have ever had much success
BannonsLiver
Oct 2018
#132
Welcome back to office, pResident Trump, luv Bernie and Susan Sarandon.
kerry-is-my-prez
Oct 2018
#108
I hope that he does not chum the water with democratic blood if he loses the nomination in 2020.
Blue_true
Oct 2018
#134
Only if he is stepping on other toes or they are stepping on his. Harris, Booker and Biden will
JCanete
Oct 2018
#144
Point was whether or not he'd be splitting the particularly progressive/liberal democratic vote with
JCanete
Oct 2018
#153
What part about concealing his tax returns do you like? That is more contradiction
R B Garr
Oct 2018
#155
Not at all. I think he should show his tax returns. I think that it is a knock against him that he
JCanete
Oct 2018
#158
So you are contradicting yourself again. This is what is observable about the
R B Garr
Oct 2018
#163
No it isn't completely different standards. Where can you point to me having different standards?
JCanete
Oct 2018
#168
I need you to tell me exactly what you think the Mueller indictments say. What point
JCanete
Oct 2018
#171
actually, you're right, I can see how that might have sounded dismissive of the whole
JCanete
Oct 2018
#173
I actually agree that those emails weren't that bad, but some people reacted strongly to them,
JCanete
Oct 2018
#176
So are you suggesting that next time he runs, if he runs, he'll do it as an independant now
JCanete
Oct 2018
#180
Both need each other. I've explained it over and over. You've ignored my explanation, presumably
JCanete
Oct 2018
#182
okay cool. I have no way of responding to another pile of nothing. Specifics, or I have no way of
JCanete
Oct 2018
#186
That does sound like a real possibility, though if it comes to pass, that will almost certainly
JCanete
Oct 2018
#156
Please don't even think about it. You're too old. I speak from experience.
Thirties Child
Oct 2018
#188