Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sanders won't promise to serve full Senate term as he considers 2020 run [View all]JCanete
(5,272 posts)146. yeah, good luck, the bar has shifted as to what the beef is. If you poke holes in a specific
criticism, suddenly the goal posts get moved without anybody having the integrity to admit that either their own claim, or the claim of a poster they've rushed in to defend, is bogus or was ill conceived.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
188 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sanders won't promise to serve full Senate term as he considers 2020 run [View all]
left-of-center2012
Oct 2018
OP
how? You think anybody else who might run should promise to serve their full senate term? I guess
JCanete
Oct 2018
#11
I don't know. So if Harris runs in 2020 you are going to say "this is so wrong"?
JCanete
Oct 2018
#38
you still have no argument here that makes any sense. Would you prefer an indie on the left to run
JCanete
Oct 2018
#101
your version of dem would have had you voting for lieberman over sanders squared off....soo
JCanete
Oct 2018
#106
how would he not "get" another shot? Actually, I think he'll sit out if Warren runs, but we'll see.
JCanete
Oct 2018
#143
In order to "get" another shot he'll have to pledge to become a Democrat and remain a Democrat....
George II
Oct 2018
#160
That's true, but that's all in his court. no body can stand in the way. He gets another
JCanete
Oct 2018
#161
Not that it's relevant to this discussion, but back when he last ran (2006, twelve years ago) ....
George II
Oct 2018
#121
no, but it makes no sense to me at all given that we knew who lieberman was already, whether
JCanete
Oct 2018
#141
Did Kamala Harris said that she wasn't sure if she wouldn't serve her full when she ran in 2016?
George II
Oct 2018
#117
The field just eyerolled ...and they ALL returned to the business of putting together a campaign
Bfd
Oct 2018
#36
Not really sure what your snark was about. Whether or not he has a chance is an entirely different
JCanete
Oct 2018
#40
I think you missed the context of my "field just got a lot smaller" statement. It was referring to
JCanete
Oct 2018
#43
Isn't that up to Vermonters? Did you have the same problem with Hillary Clinton in 2006?
karynnj
Oct 2018
#17
So it isnt about him being an independant or because he wont commit to a full term
Tiggeroshii
Oct 2018
#135
You nailed it! Bernie is not a dem. The DNC has already stated the will not support an outsider
Thekaspervote
Oct 2018
#94
yeah, good luck, the bar has shifted as to what the beef is. If you poke holes in a specific
JCanete
Oct 2018
#146
Bernie would need to run as a Dem to have any chance of winning. I don't see the Dems letting
jalan48
Oct 2018
#2
um....who are the dems. Kind of thought it was us. Kind of think, given how popular he is with dems
JCanete
Oct 2018
#12
Yeah, that's right. He ran with the Dem Party of Vermont's blessing, because this way we on the left
JCanete
Oct 2018
#50
what the hell are you talking about? I just laid out for you why he runs as a democrat,
JCanete
Oct 2018
#56
Sure if you want to define establishment your way. Its not the way I define it. It is counter to
JCanete
Oct 2018
#63
in what regard? How did I contradict myself? I may have been crappy at conveying my point, but
JCanete
Oct 2018
#76
Do you think he should have run in the GE as an independent? Answer honestly. nt
JCanete
Oct 2018
#85
I've explained why he ran as a democrat. If you think another way is viable for any of us, I'd
JCanete
Oct 2018
#88
I'd like to see him run as a Dem but I don't see it happening. Too much what happened for some.
jalan48
Oct 2018
#47
Yes, it's US, which includes the person you responded to, me, and many other registered Democrats.
George II
Oct 2018
#123
that's right, and if you haven't been paying attention, he is still popular among democrats. He may
JCanete
Oct 2018
#142
Most Democrats. that doesn't mean most will prefer him over another option in the Primary, but
JCanete
Oct 2018
#154
"Most" means more than any other, I don't think so. Where do you get that "most Democrats" from?
George II
Oct 2018
#157
No it doesn't. It just means most democrats actually like him. Look at the polling. The last one
JCanete
Oct 2018
#159
The only favorability ratings I've seen are of Senators/politicans from their own home states, not..
George II
Oct 2018
#162
that was the most recent one, sure, and in that thread I stated that the title was overplaying it.
JCanete
Oct 2018
#166
Not to mention, the media treats any potential President - no matter how unlikely -
karynnj
Oct 2018
#19
Most of the increase was from publishing, but the point is he increased his income by 500%
grantcart
Oct 2018
#61
Jimmy Carter has been a private citizen for 3.8 decades, how many books did he write....
George II
Oct 2018
#138
Same here. If Bernie wins our primary, I am 1000% behind him in the General.
Blue_true
Oct 2018
#133
I knew it! I don't understand how anyone who has been paying attention thoughgt
lunamagica
Oct 2018
#5
deep...what bullshit are you even referring to here? and why do you think its acceptable to bash
JCanete
Oct 2018
#13
Then state those facts and don't make me try to figure out what your point is. I agree Clinton was
JCanete
Oct 2018
#27
that's what primaries are for. Do you have a problem with primaries? Do you have a problem with
JCanete
Oct 2018
#33
Garr, what value is it accusing me of knowing or hiding somethign that you refuse to articulate?
JCanete
Oct 2018
#55
Establishment is not a smear. There is political machinery. There is a dogma that goes along with it
JCanete
Oct 2018
#59
ok, no idea what you're talking about. so benefitting from running as the anti-establishment
JCanete
Oct 2018
#77
hey lantern, haven't heard you pull the sacred cows out of your arsenal for a while now.
JCanete
Oct 2018
#73
Not many homeowners invite a guest back who's trashed the house once already.
LanternWaste
Oct 2018
#71
At 80, he can't promise, he'd wake up tomorrow, every day you wake up is a good day at 80....
sunonmars
Oct 2018
#20
True, but Ouch! I'n 82. Thanks for reminding me of my pending mortality..
justhanginon
Oct 2018
#125
Of course this is from The Hill. The other day their "false headline" said that Hillary was
still_one
Oct 2018
#31
Sanders or Hillary are NOT going to be the Democratic nominee. The truth is they represent
still_one
Oct 2018
#35
I love Bernie and I feel the same way. We need new blood. And I thik he is to old. But if it
zonkers
Oct 2018
#84
Sen. Sanders won't win a primary IMHO and I am not certain he will run anyway so he will serve
Demsrule86
Oct 2018
#98
Remember that TV show Columbo? And he'd have all these actors who were big once
Squinch
Oct 2018
#102
Had 2016 featured a bigger field of candidates it's unlikely he would have ever had much success
BannonsLiver
Oct 2018
#132
Welcome back to office, pResident Trump, luv Bernie and Susan Sarandon.
kerry-is-my-prez
Oct 2018
#108
I hope that he does not chum the water with democratic blood if he loses the nomination in 2020.
Blue_true
Oct 2018
#134
Only if he is stepping on other toes or they are stepping on his. Harris, Booker and Biden will
JCanete
Oct 2018
#144
Point was whether or not he'd be splitting the particularly progressive/liberal democratic vote with
JCanete
Oct 2018
#153
What part about concealing his tax returns do you like? That is more contradiction
R B Garr
Oct 2018
#155
Not at all. I think he should show his tax returns. I think that it is a knock against him that he
JCanete
Oct 2018
#158
So you are contradicting yourself again. This is what is observable about the
R B Garr
Oct 2018
#163
No it isn't completely different standards. Where can you point to me having different standards?
JCanete
Oct 2018
#168
I need you to tell me exactly what you think the Mueller indictments say. What point
JCanete
Oct 2018
#171
actually, you're right, I can see how that might have sounded dismissive of the whole
JCanete
Oct 2018
#173
I actually agree that those emails weren't that bad, but some people reacted strongly to them,
JCanete
Oct 2018
#176
So are you suggesting that next time he runs, if he runs, he'll do it as an independant now
JCanete
Oct 2018
#180
Both need each other. I've explained it over and over. You've ignored my explanation, presumably
JCanete
Oct 2018
#182
okay cool. I have no way of responding to another pile of nothing. Specifics, or I have no way of
JCanete
Oct 2018
#186
That does sound like a real possibility, though if it comes to pass, that will almost certainly
JCanete
Oct 2018
#156
Please don't even think about it. You're too old. I speak from experience.
Thirties Child
Oct 2018
#188