Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Until we have 67 Senators who will vote to impeach DT, attempts do so are futile. [View all]honest.abe
(9,238 posts)51. OMG, I cant believe you are comparing Obama to Trump.
I give up with that kind of argument.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Until we have 67 Senators who will vote to impeach DT, attempts do so are futile. [View all]
ehrnst
Nov 2018
OP
He knew that there were Republicans that would vote him out. It was another era, another GOP.
ehrnst
Nov 2018
#5
Actually yes, they do. The House votes and makes the case to the Senate, then the Senate votes.
ehrnst
Nov 2018
#11
Yes the house votes, but the Senate has to remove. We don't have the votes in the Senate.
ehrnst
Nov 2018
#22
I fully understand the process im not the one who said that we need 67 senators to impeach
Fullduplexxx
Nov 2018
#42
If we have the votes we should go ahead with impeaching him regardless of the Senate.
honest.abe
Nov 2018
#9
No it is not. A show trial is the last thing we need at this juncture. Independents absolutely....
Tarheel_Dem
Nov 2018
#44
I'm sorry, but rightwingers were making a similar case for removing Obama. You can't just...
Tarheel_Dem
Nov 2018
#49
I was making no comparison between the two. I merely stated that the same arguments you....
Tarheel_Dem
Nov 2018
#56
When Democrats started the impeachment of Richard Nixon they didn't have the votes...
PoliticAverse
Nov 2018
#10
Nixon knew there would be Republicans who would vote to impeach. And we know our Senate GOP
ehrnst
Nov 2018
#12
Shame? You think today's GOP has the capability of shame? They defended and confirmed Kavanaugh.
Tarheel_Dem
Nov 2018
#59
They defended Kavanaugh. That's the precedent they sent. And now there are more of them.(nt)
ehrnst
Nov 2018
#25
We were still right in trying to block Kavanaugh even though we were going to lose.
Garrett78
Nov 2018
#28
Of course we were. There wasn't any other option, and we had the possibilty of moving a few votes.
ehrnst
Nov 2018
#30
Clinton lied about having an affair. Trump is the most criminal president in history.
Garrett78
Nov 2018
#48
I know we wouldn't get conviction, but sometimes you just have to do what's right.
Garrett78
Nov 2018
#63
Yes, republican Senators defended Kavanaugh and they gained seats on Tuesday....
George II
Nov 2018
#65
Impeachment without a possibility of getting a conviction would make the Democrats look...
George II
Nov 2018
#64
We don't know that for sure. There's no precedent for a president *this* criminal.
Garrett78
Nov 2018
#66
While it seems incontrovertible that the GOP would not vote to impeach and remove
Mr. Ected
Nov 2018
#27
While the statement in the OP is true, it is also true that until Mueller's report is released, plus
still_one
Nov 2018
#31
If the Mueller report shows that impeachment is warranted, then the House should proceed
Poiuyt
Nov 2018
#72
Go after him legally. Taxes/business. AG. Mueller. Kavanaugh placement. All legally. Four prong.
Wintryjade
Nov 2018
#76