Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hay rick

(9,588 posts)
45. Eisenhower and Social Security.
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 08:57 PM
Aug 2012

The Social Security Online History has a page devoted to Eisenhower's statements on Social Security. Link: http://www.ssa.gov/history///ikestmts.html

Excerpts:

1. SPECIAL MESSAGE TO THE CONGRESS TRANSMITTING PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM--AUGUST 1, 1953

In my message to the Congress on the State of the Union, I pointed out that there is urgent need for making our social security programs more effective.

I stated that the provisions of the Old Age and Survivor's Insurance law should cover millions of our citizens who thus far have been excluded from participation in the social security program.
...

Under the attached plan, approximately 10 1/2 million individuals would be offered social security protection for the first time. About 6 1/2 million of these would be brought into the system; the remaining 4 million would be eligible for coverage under voluntary group arrangements. New groups to be covered would include self-employed farmers; many more farm workers and domestic workers than are now covered; doctors, dentists, lawyers, architects, accounts and other professional people; members of many state and local retirement systems on a voluntary group basis; clergymen on a voluntary group basis and several other smaller groups.
...

There are two points about these proposals which I cannot stress too strongly. One is my belief that they would add immeasurably to the peace of mind and security of the individual citizens who would be covered for the first time under this plan; the second is my belief that they would add greatly to the national sense of domestic security.


4. STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT UPON SIGNING THE SOCIAL SECURITY AMENDMENTS OF 1954. SEPTEMBER 1, 1954

I am very happy to sign the Social Security Amendments of 1954.

By enabling some 10,000,000 more Americans to participate in the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Program, it gives them an opportunity to establish a solid foundation of economic security for themselves and their families.

Beyond broadening the coverage of this program, this new law contains four other important provisions:

First, it raises payments to all retired workers by at least five dollars a month. It also raises--by $13.50 a month for retired workers and by $31.25 a month for families--the ceiling on payments to people now receiving monthly checks. People becoming eligible in the future will also receive higher payments, including increases that result from raising from $3,600 to $4,200 the maximum wage base from which the amount of their benefit checks is determined.

Second, the law eliminates the four or five lowest years of earnings from the computation of the OASI checks of workers who retire in the future. This provision is of great importance to many people whose years of unusually low earnings--for reasons of unemployment, illness, or otherwise--would sharply reduce their benefits.

Third, all retired workers under the program are permitted to earn more without forfeiting OASI checks. The amount of exempt earnings is increased to $1,200 a year, and this annual exemption is applied equally to wage earners and self-employed workers.

Fourth, the Act preserves the benefits rights, under Old-Age and Survivors Insurance, of those workers regularly covered under the program who become totally disabled for long and indefinite periods.

This new law is an important part of the broad program of the Administration and the 83d Congress to improve the well-being of our people. In the past month I have signed into law a number of other Acts directly affecting the human problems of each family in the land. These include:

1. More hospitals and nursing homes for persons who are chronically ill, special medical facilities for people not requiring hospitalization, and rehabilitation facilities for disabled people.

2. A start toward increasing from 60,000 to 200,000 by 1959, the number of disabled people rehabilitated each year.

3. Three Acts helping the States and local communities meet the nation's educational problems.

4. Help to provide and improved housing, to prevent and eliminate slums, and to conserve and develop urban communities.

5. Extension of the unemployment insurance program to almost 4,000,000 more workers.

These Acts and the Social Security amendments I have approved today will bolster the health and economic Security of the American people. They represent one of the cornerstones of our program to build a better and stronger America.


5. SPECIAL MESSAGE TO THE CONGRESS ON OLD AGE AND SURVIVORS INSURANCE AND ON FEDERAL GRANTS-IN-AID FOR PUBLIC ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS. JANUARY 14, 1954

3. OASI Benefits Should Be Increased.

Today, thousands of OASI beneficiaries receive the minimum benefit of twenty-five dollars a month. The average individual benefit for retired workers approximates fifty dollars a month. The maximum benefit for an individual is $85 a month. For OASI to fulfill its purpose of helping to combat destitution, these benefits are too low.

I recommend, therefore, that benefits now being received by retired workers be increased on the basis of a new formula to be submitted to the appropriate Committees by the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare. This formula should also provide increases for workers retiring in the future, raising both the minimum and the maximum benefits. These increases will further the objectives of the program and will strengthen the foundation on which its participants may build their own security.
...

6. The Benefit Rights of the Disabled Should Be Protected. One of the injustices in the present law is its failure to make secure the benefit rights of the worker who his a substantial work record in covered employment and who becomes totally disabled. If his disability lasts four years or less, my preceding recommendation will alleviate this hardship. But if a worker's earnings and contributions cease for a longer period, his retirement rights, and the survivor rights of his widow and children may be reduced or even lost altogether. Equity dictates that this defect be remedied. I recommend, therefore, that the benefits of a worker who has a substantial work record in covered employment and who becomes totally disabled for an extended period be maintained at the amount he would have received had he become 65 and retired on the date his disability began.


6. STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT UPON SIGNING THE SOCIAL SECURITY AMENDMENTS OF 1956. AUGUST 1, 1956

The new law also contains certain major provisions which were recommended by the Administration. It extends social security coverage to about 600,000 additional farm owners or operators and about 225,000 self-employed lawyers, dentists, and others.


Eisenhower's Presidency included the establishment of the Federal Employees Health Benefit Plan and the establishment and extension of disability benefits through the Social Security Administration.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There is no way Eisenhower would be accepted into the RETHUG party of today... hlthe2b Aug 2012 #1
There is no way that Ronald Reagan would be accepted in today's Republican Party Gothmog Aug 2012 #11
Yes he would be NNN0LHI Aug 2012 #28
yes exactly rockingirl Aug 2012 #56
Nope. Raised taxes. Socialist. bornskeptic Aug 2012 #95
Reagan dd no such thing-- Jackpine Radical Aug 2012 #100
Are you kidding? Reagan would fit in nicely with today's GOP Art_from_Ark Aug 2012 #33
Now that is the Reagan this old man remembers NNN0LHI Aug 2012 #34
Don't forget that under Reagan, ketchup was counted as a vegetable for school lunch purposes. amandabeech Aug 2012 #55
Reagan would get the nomination today. Blanks Aug 2012 #84
I guess today's Republicans would love having their capital gains tax rate raised to "normal" rates? cascadiance Aug 2012 #85
Reagan might have marginally increased some capital gains rates Art_from_Ark Aug 2012 #103
Sure he would. He would have read whatever grover put in front of him. Jakes Progress Aug 2012 #89
He was a good man. I really don't think he would want in this Republican party. Booster Aug 2012 #25
Sorry, but I have to disagree: Genial maybe, but rotten thru and thru (see above) FailureToCommunicate Aug 2012 #38
Agreed 100%. Here are three memorable quotes from the gipper: nightscanner59 Aug 2012 #53
Don't forget - xxqqqzme Aug 2012 #72
I think you got the threading confused a2liberal Aug 2012 #68
Yep, wrong place. Typing while drowsy. FailureToCommunicate Aug 2012 #77
Are you talking about Ronnie or Ike? I was talking about Ike. Booster Aug 2012 #71
Ronnie. Sorry 'bout that. FailureToCommunicate Aug 2012 #78
Ike was genial too, but Jakes Progress Aug 2012 #90
He even warned us about what was to come with the A Simple Game Aug 2012 #64
Which he helped build. Javaman Aug 2012 #79
Absolutely true. INdemo Aug 2012 #83
not only that SemperEadem Aug 2012 #96
as they say today Glaisne Aug 2012 #98
Back in those days at least some Republicans had some sense and Tennessee Gal Aug 2012 #2
President Eisenhower was a Republican spartan61 Aug 2012 #3
It's not a political party anymore it's a cult of machismo. xtraxritical Aug 2012 #63
I like Ike now rbrnmw Aug 2012 #4
Although it was a republican who said it, LeftofObama Aug 2012 #5
You got it. NOT. A. REPUBLICAN. TALKING. POINT. AND. NEVER. WAS. Zorra Aug 2012 #87
New name Barry2012 Aug 2012 #6
They ARE stupid. Major Hogwash Aug 2012 #7
^^^true^^^ n/t irisblue Aug 2012 #97
that splinter group has morphed into the modern teabagger movement datasuspect Aug 2012 #8
The quote is from a letter Eisenhower wrote to his brother...... YellaDog1950 Aug 2012 #60
whoa! heaven05 Aug 2012 #9
Damn commie! baldguy Aug 2012 #10
Obviously from "Old Europe." calimary Aug 2012 #18
He was dsteve01 Aug 2012 #12
I see what you did there! Raine1967 Aug 2012 #13
the problem is so many working class yokels are saying 'a-yup' and voting repook KG Aug 2012 #14
He was a great president. riverbendviewgal Aug 2012 #15
he did make some bad calls 90-percent Aug 2012 #23
re: Ike & Desegregation OmahaBlueDog Aug 2012 #48
I agree nearly 100%... Moostache Aug 2012 #91
K&R! nt whatchamacallit Aug 2012 #16
That "RINO"? get the red out Aug 2012 #17
"Should ANY political party..." FiveGoodMen Aug 2012 #19
good point (n/t) a2liberal Aug 2012 #69
Naw, you only get tossed here if you say something "mean" about palin. russspeakeasy Aug 2012 #20
He's a Troll! A TROLL, I tells ya!!! Jeff In Milwaukee Aug 2012 #21
Hey, Nixon was a saint compared to the latter-day thugs: jsr Aug 2012 #22
Agreed. Vidar Aug 2012 #24
That's back before the Party Flip. MADem Aug 2012 #26
He saw up close and personal what Nazism could do Wednesdays Aug 2012 #57
I'm guilty of refering to this non-stop orpupilofnature57 Aug 2012 #27
Back then, both parties had a sense of decency. Maybe not in South. Eom Hoyt Aug 2012 #29
Their number is no longer negligible, Turbineguy Aug 2012 #30
Good source cite to say "THEY ARE STUPID" now, 'cause President Eisenhower said they are. patrice Aug 2012 #31
He also said, with respect to Nixon's contributions, "If you give me a week, I might think of one." AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #32
This video is a gem! nt snappyturtle Aug 2012 #44
lol I bet Ike would hate these guys running his party now rbrnmw Aug 2012 #50
Oh, that leftwing stooge! aquart Aug 2012 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author Vogon_Glory Aug 2012 #36
I Concur, And To Touch On An Earlier Republican Talking-Point Vogon_Glory Aug 2012 #36
+1 It most definitely is a class war. nt snappyturtle Aug 2012 #42
This was before the Dixiecrats defected to the Republicans bigbrother05 Aug 2012 #39
Indeed, I think Goldwater had some nasty words Wednesdays Aug 2012 #58
Old Old School BrainMann1 Aug 2012 #40
This isn't your Fathers Texasgal Aug 2012 #41
Unfortunately after 30 years of propaganda WhoIsNumberNone Aug 2012 #43
Eisenhower and Social Security. hay rick Aug 2012 #45
Sounds like a commie :-P a2liberal Aug 2012 #70
To see how much the Republicans have changed, watch the Katherine Hepburn-Spencer Tracy movie Lydia Leftcoast Aug 2012 #46
The cancer of that tiny splinter group has metastasized to the entire GOP/RW/conservative indepat Aug 2012 #47
When one compares Eisenhower with the likes of Romney and Ryan 'splinters' Rosa Luxemburg Aug 2012 #49
Or when Dumb ass Dan Quack evoked JFK , orpupilofnature57 Aug 2012 #51
Ike would be considered a Liberal today. Odin2005 Aug 2012 #52
That would make a provocative ad. A quite good one I think. AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #54
I concur FreeBC Aug 2012 #74
This is not 'a Republican talking point,' elleng Aug 2012 #59
Amazing how much the republican party B Calm Aug 2012 #61
what's the deal. tweeted this 4 times and the tweet total didn't go up nt Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2012 #62
This "Republican talking point" died with Ike. ronwelldobbs Aug 2012 #65
Eisenhower was the last great Republican President. 4lbs Aug 2012 #66
I don't think Eisenhower was a great President. Chef Eric Aug 2012 #75
Even then big oil was calling the shots WhoIsNumberNone Aug 2012 #82
re:DU may have to TS me - I agree 100% with this Republican talking point allan01 Aug 2012 #67
The teabaggers would be calling Ike a lefty commie today. n/t backscatter712 Aug 2012 #73
Source is here for original quote: steve2470 Aug 2012 #76
Exactly. It never was a republican talking point. It's a quote from a letter that he wrote Zorra Aug 2012 #88
And Preston Bush; greiner3 Aug 2012 #80
Prescott Bush WhoIsNumberNone Aug 2012 #81
Me too. Panasonic Aug 2012 #86
the ugly 1% Splinter group pulls the strings of the RepubliProles Berlum Aug 2012 #92
You know how they had a hologram of Tupac perform at an awards show? Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2012 #93
K&R "Embarrassed Republicans Admit They've Been Thinking Of Eisenhower DianaForRussFeingold Aug 2012 #94
I Like Ike !!! WillyT Aug 2012 #99
Rachel Maddow did a good piece on this last year. bvar22 Aug 2012 #101
I wish I could believe that today's Dems would never move to cut SS or Medicare, NorthCarolina Aug 2012 #102
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DU may have to TS me - I ...»Reply #45