Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sinema, Rosen, and Espy (possibly) better than Heitkamp, Donnelly, and McCaskill [View all]Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)38. I want a majority. The 'wobbly ' Democrats as you describe them are needed for a majority without
which even if we manage to get the presidency in 20 we will not be able get SCOTUS nominees or any judges approved. So meaning no disrespect, I think you fail to understand my post and our situation. The Senate is unattainable for us without conservadems...IE big tent majority. So I see nothing good about the situation in the Senate...glad we stopped the GOP from 60 which was possible with the terrible map. Thank God we got the House. Had the 'wobbly' Democrats won in the Senate, we would have a majority.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sinema, Rosen, and Espy (possibly) better than Heitkamp, Donnelly, and McCaskill [View all]
kennetha
Nov 2018
OP
Such nonsense. They were not replaced with Democrats but Republicans. Had they won, we would have
Demsrule86
Nov 2018
#1
That is true. But the poster stated it was a silver lining to get rid of wobbly' Democrats...I just
Demsrule86
Nov 2018
#50
We would have a majority...I do not see a silver lining when any Democratic Senator loses
Demsrule86
Nov 2018
#5
I want a majority. The 'wobbly ' Democrats as you describe them are needed for a majority without
Demsrule86
Nov 2018
#38
If we can pull those off it is a huge deal. Either way what happened in the midterms will give us
still_one
Nov 2018
#4
Heitkamp, Donnelly and McCaskill are infinitley better than the assholes who are replacing them.
GoCubsGo
Nov 2018
#11
No we are not better off...these are still conservative leaning states so they will have to vote
Demsrule86
Nov 2018
#41
Yeah, run-offs generally favor GOP and combined GOP vote was something like 57-58%
book_worm
Nov 2018
#33
one reason that it is better for AZ and Nevade, they are purple moving to blue while Indiania never
beachbum bob
Nov 2018
#34
be better, but realisticlly we have states that do all they can to prevent the "wrong kind of"
beachbum bob
Nov 2018
#36