Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

totodeinhere

(13,688 posts)

17. I don't think they will storm the embassy. IMO that is just a bluff.

Reply to cali (Original post)

Thu Aug 16, 2012, 01:19 PM

Aug 2012

But what they could do is cut off the embassy's water supply and power just like they threatened to do in Panama to the Vatican embassy if they didn't release Noriega. And it worked. Noriega was kicked out of the Vatican embassy and promptly arrested.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I don't care where you stand on Assange, what GB is doing sets a dangerous precedent [View all] cali Aug 2012 OP

If David Camerwrong approves this it will merely confirm what most have suspected for a long time... truebrit71 Aug 2012 #1

or vice-versa. HiPointDem Aug 2012 #11

Couldn't agree more, cali. Vidar Aug 2012 #2

I really really hope it is just a poorly advised bluff. morningfog Aug 2012 #3

The story was an over-reaction by Ecuador struggle4progress Aug 2012 #22

Cameron warned that they could go in, did he not? morningfog Aug 2012 #24

What exactly did the government say? nt hack89 Aug 2012 #4

Full (translated) text: muriel_volestrangler Aug 2012 #6

Agreed. HopeHoops Aug 2012 #5

For some reason, this reminds me of... RevStPatrick Aug 2012 #7

This is madness. oldironside Aug 2012 #8

How Can they? Wolf Frankula Aug 2012 #10

you just know the US is pushing this response. ChairmanAgnostic Aug 2012 #9

The UK cannot legally invade the Ecuador embassy. The threatening letter is a diplomatic Swagman Aug 2012 #12

There have been several cases in history when sovereign embassies were indeed violated. totodeinhere Aug 2012 #14

Not London, oldironside Aug 2012 #18

of course the UK can do any bloody thing they want and they do Swagman Aug 2012 #26

No, it's not sovereign soil muriel_volestrangler Aug 2012 #16

All of the strings being pulled here hifiguy Aug 2012 #13

Not precedent-setting at all. Robb Aug 2012 #15

Can you provide examples of Embassy immunity stripping for purposes of raids? morningfog Aug 2012 #25

I believe it is an untested statute that came about when PC Fletcher was shot dead Swagman Aug 2012 #29

I prefer to listen to learned British QCs and the former British ambassador Swagman Aug 2012 #27

yes, it would be. Sorry, but you are flat wrong cali Aug 2012 #28

I don't think they will storm the embassy. IMO that is just a bluff. totodeinhere Aug 2012 #17

The UK's gonna chill a while and let Ecuador think matters thru struggle4progress Aug 2012 #20

I doubt they would even do that. Swagman Aug 2012 #30

This message was self-deleted by its author struggle4progress Aug 2012 #19

Anonymous have made a statement: Fire Walk With Me Aug 2012 #21

I think Assange is a sexual predator & and charlatan But the UK is being absurd with the threats... CabCurious Aug 2012 #23

you give a whole new meaning to 'sexual predator' that should frighten every young man. Swagman Aug 2012 #31

Agreed. Just really sad. nt riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #32

Well.. sendero Aug 2012 #33

Yes. This isn't about any charges or even about Assange himself. This is about showing us what Egalitarian Thug Aug 2012 #34