Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Indicting Mitt Romney is nearly impossible - now [View all]laserhaas
(7,805 posts)52. Link about Bain Capital and Puerto Rico Bond bailout
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/06/09/rat-fink-ryan-pushes-passage-of-puerto-rico-bain-capital-bond-seller-rescue-through-house/
One strange anomaly is that - many times I point out facts and corroborative links - and the articles get rewritten or redacted.
Like the fact Romney's 2012 Campaign ( Mitt has never publicly said the words; because he would be confessing to perjury) - went on the record stating Romney was "retroactively" retired from August 2001, back to February 11, 1999. -- This was a glaring period of time; because Colm Connolly was a MNAT partner from 1999, until August 2, 2001 (the exact time I turned down a reported the eToys case bribe was mid-2001, and the Mattel, Fingerhut and Kay Bee frauds began between 1999 and August 2001).
Being that Colm Connolly was an MNAT partner at the time (Nd Colm may be linked to Wheeler's murder) Mitt wants to distance himself from Colm Connolly.
So the article that said 2001 - "retroactively" - changed it to 2002. Makes a slight difference; but makes Romney more guilty in other ways.
One strange anomaly is that - many times I point out facts and corroborative links - and the articles get rewritten or redacted.
Like the fact Romney's 2012 Campaign ( Mitt has never publicly said the words; because he would be confessing to perjury) - went on the record stating Romney was "retroactively" retired from August 2001, back to February 11, 1999. -- This was a glaring period of time; because Colm Connolly was a MNAT partner from 1999, until August 2, 2001 (the exact time I turned down a reported the eToys case bribe was mid-2001, and the Mattel, Fingerhut and Kay Bee frauds began between 1999 and August 2001).
Being that Colm Connolly was an MNAT partner at the time (Nd Colm may be linked to Wheeler's murder) Mitt wants to distance himself from Colm Connolly.
So the article that said 2001 - "retroactively" - changed it to 2002. Makes a slight difference; but makes Romney more guilty in other ways.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations