Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This Assange business definitely uncovers certain peoples' priorities [View all]Dreamer Tatum
(10,996 posts)28. I didn't say he was. I said he might be.
But we'll never know, because he'll never stand trial.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
171 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This Assange business definitely uncovers certain peoples' priorities [View all]
Dreamer Tatum
Aug 2012
OP
Or, Sir, People May Simply have Kept themselves Informed, and Drawn Conclusions You Do Not Like
The Magistrate
Aug 2012
#1
Your Problem, Sir, Remains: You Claim People Are Not Examining Evidence And Drawing Conclusions
The Magistrate
Aug 2012
#7
Again, Sir: They Are Drawing Conclusions You Do Not Like, Which Does Not Make them Wrong
The Magistrate
Aug 2012
#48
i really hate how the establishment pushes a right-leaning agenda under the cover of women's/
HiPointDem
Aug 2012
#11
Like humanitarian war, it's another failed, transparent attempt to reclaim the moral high ground
leveymg
Aug 2012
#54
"make well-intended people allies" = the most disgusting aspect. including the corollary, painting
HiPointDem
Aug 2012
#56
There's a smarmy quality to this charade. Smug, self-satisfied, Puritanical yet sleazy
leveymg
Aug 2012
#70
"puritanical yet sleazy" = yes. but the puritanism is fake, only the political sleaziness is real.
HiPointDem
Aug 2012
#75
Or he might not be a rapist at all...especially when you consider Sweden's sweeping definition...
truebrit71
Aug 2012
#125
gosh he's a "filthy fucking rapist" but he hasn't even been charged. yes, some people's
HiPointDem
Aug 2012
#12
right, that's the ticket. it's really amusing to see all you folks twist yourselves up trying to
HiPointDem
Aug 2012
#101
I love to see the list of individuals who have had international arrest warrants
morningfog
Aug 2012
#8
Someone In the Libyan Embassy, Years Ago, Sir, Shot From the Building And Killed A Police Officer
The Magistrate
Aug 2012
#13
Or, alternatively, "tweaking the US MIC" makes him guilty of rape until proven innocent.
Marr
Aug 2012
#16
Except the women themselves aren't calling it "rape", nor did they want to press charges
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#34
This case is about "rape" just like Clinton's impeachment was about "perjury"
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#30
Except the women themselves aren't calling it "rape", nor did they want to press charges
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#37
You know continuously re-publishing these allegations may ramp up your post count
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#57
You've been answered ad nauseum. Feel free to check out any of the dozens of replies to your posts
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#72
I'm absolutely certain that Assange's lawyers have offered him to take the test in the UK
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#157
You're putting the cart before the horse - the tweak of the US MIC likely led to the allegation.
leveymg
Aug 2012
#49
I am not a fan of Assange but you have to be somewhat gullible to believe that these charges
grantcart
Aug 2012
#62
the difference being that is was the WOMEN making those accusations against cain..
frylock
Aug 2012
#82
The accusers in the Cain allegations had made official complaints and received a settlement
grantcart
Aug 2012
#87
He has been very careful and it is unlikely that he broke any serious laws or they would
grantcart
Aug 2012
#132
I imagine many people can observe the leaks as one thing, an allegation of rape as a wholly separate
LanternWaste
Aug 2012
#81
How can someone violate our statutes and be supposedly not have to be prosecuted?
treestar
Aug 2012
#148
I don't know, I like these OPs which provide an opportunity to present FACTS and then
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#137
Would the UK threaten to attack an embassy over *any* other rape suspect?
Posteritatis
Aug 2012
#134
Anyone that buys this farce is dedicated to such. The unusual and without precedent
TheKentuckian
Aug 2012
#143