Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How the Pelosi "issue" will end [View all]Midwestern Democrat
(1,064 posts)65. Honestly, Clyburn should have been bumped from leadership back in 2010. When we lost the House in
2010, Pelosi should have allowed the traditional process to play itself out - the minority party only has two leadership positions instead of three - so what Pelosi SHOULD have done is let Hoyer and Clyburn run against each other for Minority Whip - a race Hoyer would have won. Had Pelosi simply allowed the normal process to happen, right now we would have an opportunity to elect a younger, rising star Democrat as Majority Whip. Instead, Pelosi created an entirely new leadership position in 2010 so Clyburn could remain in the leadership and essentially be Majority Whip in Waiting.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I like to look at candidates' RECORDS to see if they are the best. Words and promises
Doitnow
Nov 2018
#67
Are you suggesting that someone who was just elected - or hasn't even been elected yet
EffieBlack
Nov 2018
#30
That's right. A discussion of some change and new ideas is also NOT sexist or ageist!!
LBM20
Nov 2018
#59
It is not "Anti Pelosi." It is Pro-Change. There need to be occasional leadership changes or
LBM20
Nov 2018
#58
It'll happen in the Dem caucus and all the ones afraid that the repugs don't like...
brush
Nov 2018
#40
Pelosi told anyone interested in running for the position to "come on in, the water is warm".
MrsCoffee
Nov 2018
#16
That's right. Parties need periodic changes in leadership. I am all good with Pelosi for another
LBM20
Nov 2018
#57
Agreed. Personally, I think we should have an entirely new House leadership by 2022 at the latest.
Midwestern Democrat
Nov 2018
#63
We always had a few Republican lites as Democrats. Because those are their constituants.
haele
Nov 2018
#15
So you think everyone who voted for her was a vote against Nancy Pelosi? Come on....
pwb
Nov 2018
#54
It's just too early. Republicans hate her and I believe are likely behind this.
libdem4life
Nov 2018
#26
How many "present" votes or "no" voters will get placed on substantive committees?
allgood33
Nov 2018
#36
Honestly, Clyburn should have been bumped from leadership back in 2010. When we lost the House in
Midwestern Democrat
Nov 2018
#65
Congressman Joe Crowely (D-NY), Caucus Chair, is on his way out of Congress.
Eric J in MN
Nov 2018
#69
The skills that make her a great Speaker, are the same skills that she is using to win it.
irresistable
Nov 2018
#53