General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This Assange business definitely uncovers certain peoples' priorities [View all]Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)You know exactly what he is afraid of?
http://anniemachon.ch/annie_machon/2012/08/the-assange-witch-hunt.html
"The UK justifies this by citing the 1987 Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act, a law apparently put in place following the 1984 shooting of WPC Yvonne Fletcher from the Libyan Embassy in London. The murder resulted in an 11-day siege, and the embassy staff eventually being expelled from the country. Nobody has yet been brought to justice for this murder.
It is hard to equate the gravity of the crime that brought about the 1987 legislation the murder of a policewoman with Assanges situation. Despite the screaming headlines, let us not forget that he is merely wanted for questioning in Sweden. Nevertheless, the UK is prepared to overturn all diplomatic protocol and create a dangerous international precedent to 'get their man,' despite there being a clear lack of justification under the terms of the 87 Act.
Many people in the western media remain puzzled about Assanges fear of being held captive in the Swedish legal system. But can we really trust Swedish justice when it has been flagrantly politicised and manipulated in the Assange case, as has been repeatedly well documented. Indeed, the Swedish justice system has the highest rate per capita of cases taken to the ECtHR for flouting Article 6 the right to a fair trial.
If Assange were extradited merely for questioning by police he has yet to be even charged with any crime in Sweden there is a strong risk that the Swedes will just shove him straight on the next plane to the US under the legal terms of a 'temporary surrender.' And in the US, a secret Grand Jury has been convened in Virginia to find a law any law with which to prosecute Assange. Hell, if the Yanks cant find an existing law, they will probably write a new one just for him."