Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This Assange business definitely uncovers certain peoples' priorities [View all]2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)113. dream on, dear Dreamer
You have proven your own point with your own agenda and viewpoint, much more than anyone else on this thread has done.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
171 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This Assange business definitely uncovers certain peoples' priorities [View all]
Dreamer Tatum
Aug 2012
OP
Or, Sir, People May Simply have Kept themselves Informed, and Drawn Conclusions You Do Not Like
The Magistrate
Aug 2012
#1
Your Problem, Sir, Remains: You Claim People Are Not Examining Evidence And Drawing Conclusions
The Magistrate
Aug 2012
#7
Again, Sir: They Are Drawing Conclusions You Do Not Like, Which Does Not Make them Wrong
The Magistrate
Aug 2012
#48
i really hate how the establishment pushes a right-leaning agenda under the cover of women's/
HiPointDem
Aug 2012
#11
Like humanitarian war, it's another failed, transparent attempt to reclaim the moral high ground
leveymg
Aug 2012
#54
"make well-intended people allies" = the most disgusting aspect. including the corollary, painting
HiPointDem
Aug 2012
#56
There's a smarmy quality to this charade. Smug, self-satisfied, Puritanical yet sleazy
leveymg
Aug 2012
#70
"puritanical yet sleazy" = yes. but the puritanism is fake, only the political sleaziness is real.
HiPointDem
Aug 2012
#75
Or he might not be a rapist at all...especially when you consider Sweden's sweeping definition...
truebrit71
Aug 2012
#125
gosh he's a "filthy fucking rapist" but he hasn't even been charged. yes, some people's
HiPointDem
Aug 2012
#12
right, that's the ticket. it's really amusing to see all you folks twist yourselves up trying to
HiPointDem
Aug 2012
#101
I love to see the list of individuals who have had international arrest warrants
morningfog
Aug 2012
#8
Someone In the Libyan Embassy, Years Ago, Sir, Shot From the Building And Killed A Police Officer
The Magistrate
Aug 2012
#13
Or, alternatively, "tweaking the US MIC" makes him guilty of rape until proven innocent.
Marr
Aug 2012
#16
Except the women themselves aren't calling it "rape", nor did they want to press charges
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#34
This case is about "rape" just like Clinton's impeachment was about "perjury"
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#30
Except the women themselves aren't calling it "rape", nor did they want to press charges
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#37
You know continuously re-publishing these allegations may ramp up your post count
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#57
You've been answered ad nauseum. Feel free to check out any of the dozens of replies to your posts
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#72
I'm absolutely certain that Assange's lawyers have offered him to take the test in the UK
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#157
You're putting the cart before the horse - the tweak of the US MIC likely led to the allegation.
leveymg
Aug 2012
#49
I am not a fan of Assange but you have to be somewhat gullible to believe that these charges
grantcart
Aug 2012
#62
the difference being that is was the WOMEN making those accusations against cain..
frylock
Aug 2012
#82
The accusers in the Cain allegations had made official complaints and received a settlement
grantcart
Aug 2012
#87
He has been very careful and it is unlikely that he broke any serious laws or they would
grantcart
Aug 2012
#132
I imagine many people can observe the leaks as one thing, an allegation of rape as a wholly separate
LanternWaste
Aug 2012
#81
How can someone violate our statutes and be supposedly not have to be prosecuted?
treestar
Aug 2012
#148
I don't know, I like these OPs which provide an opportunity to present FACTS and then
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#137
Would the UK threaten to attack an embassy over *any* other rape suspect?
Posteritatis
Aug 2012
#134
Anyone that buys this farce is dedicated to such. The unusual and without precedent
TheKentuckian
Aug 2012
#143