ALERT: Another Group Attempting To Blackmail Nancy Pelosi

[Celerity]

96. this is venturing into Alice Through the Looking Glass level of dross

There was NO OTHER POSTER

I was referring to YOU and you alone the entire time

you replied to the OP with pure tosh here https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211469332#post1

wherein you tried ludicrously to link Cenk and Sarandon to Problem Solvers (a branch of No Labels) insinuating (falsely) that Cenk and Sarandon where in cahoots with the centrist Problem Solvers crew

when they (the OP maker) responded here https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211469332#post5

I replied (to the OP maker) that you were wrong and that YOU had used similar misframing before

again.. YOU were the one who tangentially injected Cenk and Saradon into this entire thread (on the VERY first reply to the OP), NOT ME

I, based off YOUR previous posts in other threads (which I showed) said that this attempt to misframe (by insinuating they, ie Cenk and Sarandon supported PS and thus the No Labels Lieberman/Republican backed centrist to RW crew) was ridiculous

those two groups (Cenk et al v PS/No Labels) DETEST each others' political stances

You HAVE previously conflated Cenk/TYT/JD

I did NOT make that up

I have shown this in my replies

you are trying to micro-parse words and order of posts in a futile attempt to try and discredit a totally legitimate rebuttal of your original reply

now you have, through a multiple number of replies, tried to spin it to an absolutely silly level of inanity, where you think there is a ANOTHER poster I am referencing in this

I am not nor did I respond about a third party, it is all on you

you keep ranting about Justice Democrats and how you never put Cenk and them together, and so I showed exactly where you did before, you made no separation before, now you claim 'OMG I (meaning YOU) never did!'

I should have also referenced Saradon in my very first post on this thread (as you tossed her in there on your reply number one) as well

you also tried to say my opinions are invalid because I have been here only five months and can string together logical thoughts complete with examples

YOU have been here TWO months!

its a chatboard! not a thesis paper on stochastic economic modelling, its not hard to type and think and post on a very basic level (mechanically wise)

you also accused me, outrageously of Doxxing you when all I did was QUOTE YOU from this very board

you are truly in the weeds