Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: My major concern about the Beto for President push [View all]John Fante
(3,479 posts)90. "We faced the same type of incumbency disadvantage in 2004."
No, we did not. Bush was a wartime incumbent with approval ratings in the 50% range, and they got as high as 90% after 9/11. Trump has yet to sniff GWB's post-9/11 low point.. Iraq was divisive, but Americans didn't completely turn on that war until 2005-2006. Even with all that in Dubya's favor, he was pushed to the brink by Kerry.
Trump would need the economy to stay this hot to have any hope of winning re-election. It's the only thing propping him up at that point.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
176 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Stacey Abrams and Andrew Gillum are authentic. They talked about real problems and solutions.
mcar
Nov 2018
#132
They did not get millions to watch their response to town hall questions. People
applegrove
Nov 2018
#145
Um - people from around the country watched and we're inspired and excited by their campaigns
EffieBlack
Nov 2018
#148
I never said they were bad candidates. They were great candidates. Organically
applegrove
Nov 2018
#150
This is not Canada. And I don't think Beto is our guy for 20...maybe in the future.
Demsrule86
Nov 2018
#163
I think the same argument can be made about Obama in 2007 and '08. All people talked about...
In It to Win It
Nov 2018
#51
Obama served in the Illinois Senate for 7 years before he became a US Senator.
LeftInTX
Nov 2018
#74
Simply because a candidate has "crowds" and "enthusiasm" doesn't mean he doesn't have substance
grantcart
Nov 2018
#156
Beto O'Rourke wasn't a black man running for statewide office held by only one other POC in history
EffieBlack
Nov 2018
#138
Agree. Would loved to see him have tackled healthcare, post-9/11 wars, deficit, etc.
Hoyt
Nov 2018
#31
It's like comparing the LeBron led Cavaliers for falling to the Warriors.
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2018
#111
It was a great effort. But it doesn't prove he's ready to run for and be President
EffieBlack
Nov 2018
#113
It's been what? 150 years since we sent a Congressman to the White House without winning a state
TeamPooka
Nov 2018
#64
There's always one around exciting the base, Gephardt, Kucinich, now Beto. I see him as a VP or more
TeamPooka
Nov 2018
#80
Ignore the choices the american people have made historically for a century and half
TeamPooka
Nov 2018
#93
I was just gonna say that John, We have a fucking reality show person now........
Old Vet
Nov 2018
#110
Wow, Are you fucking kidding me. Seems you throw that bullshit out real quick........
Old Vet
Nov 2018
#164
I would like to know why POC who came very very close are not afforded the deep admiration of
Demsrule86
Nov 2018
#161
I don't that qualifies Barack Obama any more than Beto's 6 years in the House.
In It to Win It
Nov 2018
#28
+ A successful Senate election, president Harvard Law Review, 2 thoughtful books
EffieBlack
Nov 2018
#33
And to add: then have somebody dig up something really embarrassing about him/her
Proud Liberal Dem
Nov 2018
#120
I think if he runs for Cornyn's seat in 2020, I'm not convinced he will win. It will be...
In It to Win It
Nov 2018
#30
Why specifically, based on what you know about him right now, do you think he could beat Trump?
EffieBlack
Nov 2018
#35
Even though people only seem to talk about the enthusiam and crowd sizes...
In It to Win It
Nov 2018
#40
"Enthusiasm," "supposedly distinguishing himself from Democrats who aren't running
EffieBlack
Nov 2018
#43
Ok. Under the current circumstances, who do you think will win against Trump?
In It to Win It
Nov 2018
#50
Unless he can win in Texas, assuming he can win elsewhere is all speculation.
EffieBlack
Nov 2018
#81
Beto O'Rourke can run for US Senate in 2020 against John Cornyn instead. NT
Eric J in MN
Nov 2018
#47
You could have said the same for Obama early on but it worked out beautifully. nt
Quixote1818
Nov 2018
#69
I donated to Beto even though I'm from MA but did not know at the time that he voted for Tim Ryan
seaglass
Nov 2018
#94
Is it possible to get any worse than Trump in terms of ability to govern? n/t
Zing Zing Zingbah
Nov 2018
#122
Yes.. Texas attracts national attention because of its size (electoral votes)
LeftInTX
Nov 2018
#153
I appreciate your post and agree it's well-thought out, but please be careful
EffieBlack
Nov 2018
#173
Looking for a savior...wrong approach. Get someone who can work in Washington like
Demsrule86
Nov 2018
#159