Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Sanders: I will probably run in 2020 if I'm the best candidate to beat Trump [View all]JCanete
(5,272 posts)262. First, wapo has a reason to present their facts the way they do. They like the status quo,
hell they're owned by one of the richest men in the world.
Second, even their framing doesn't amount to your outlandish claim that Sanders is the reason votes went from Clinton to Trump. You don't have any evidence these voters would have been there for Clinton, and don't you see? That's the crux of the whole thing. If you can't show that then you can't support your argument that Sanders hurt Clinton by running in the GE. All you can support is that Sanders attracted certain voters that Clinton did not.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
269 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie Sanders: I will probably run in 2020 if I'm the best candidate to beat Trump [View all]
Mrs. Overall
Nov 2018
OP
you have no numbers to back that up, and that is hardly the picture the numbers actually paint. nt
JCanete
Nov 2018
#57
I know you've seen the refutation of the nonsense you just _+100000'd in the past, but
JCanete
Nov 2018
#198
I saw what you said, but I wouldn't characterize it was "refutation" since....
George II
Nov 2018
#209
The issue is that those concrete facts, while concrete don't say what you or he are saying they say.
JCanete
Nov 2018
#221
First, wapo has a reason to present their facts the way they do. They like the status quo,
JCanete
Nov 2018
#262
So you are admitting that you have no facts to refute the Washington Post's excellant analysis
Gothmog
Nov 2018
#264
Quit lying about what I'm saying. Please. I've never refuted the facts in the article.
JCanete
Nov 2018
#267
you seriously haven't seen that study before? Its still a lousy argument too, and I've
JCanete
Nov 2018
#200
They didn't want him, but they wanted to severely damage Clinton's general election candidacy.
George II
Nov 2018
#212
Putin absolutely despises Hillary Clinton. That overrides just about anything else.
George II
Nov 2018
#218
Doubtful, and you also have no evidence to back up that claim. Just an opinion. If you have data
JCanete
Nov 2018
#199
There are specific concrete reasons for that, but I'm not going to get into it.
George II
Nov 2018
#213
I know you don't, since I can refute this very argument, never have my refutation challenged, and
JCanete
Nov 2018
#197
Did enough Bernie Sanders supporters vote for Trump to cost Clinton the election?
Gothmog
Nov 2018
#238
And how does who Sanders supporters-a small percentage of them-voting for Trump, prove
JCanete
Nov 2018
#240
They know tRump's collusion with the Russians stole the election from Hillary...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2018
#162
Some study that actually shows that Sanders running hurt Clinton? Numbers that extrapolate
JCanete
Nov 2018
#223
I said I didn't have any such numbers. I said I wouldn't make the bold claim that I KNOW
JCanete
Nov 2018
#231
They are facts. I didn't deny them. They just don't add up to what you are saying they add up to. nt
JCanete
Nov 2018
#241
ugh.. I did explain it. Your claim is predicated on an unverifiable assumption that had Sanders not
JCanete
Nov 2018
#248
The fact that you think that you disproved anything is really cute and adorable
Gothmog
Nov 2018
#249
Again, the fact that you think that proved anything is really cute and adorable
Gothmog
Nov 2018
#250
I give up. Instead of actually dealing with my criticism of your conclusions, you just go back to
JCanete
Nov 2018
#255
You should consider reading up on the issues and using facts to support your claims
Gothmog
Nov 2018
#256
The comments that gave rise to the OP were in connection with sandes latest book tour
Gothmog
Nov 2018
#263
He most certainly hurt the Dems by refusing to concede when he could not mathematically win
KitSileya
Nov 2018
#194
Aside from that, his support for Clinton was lukewarm throughout the general election campaign....
George II
Nov 2018
#246
I was active in the Super Tuesday primaries and it was clear that sanders lost
Gothmog
Nov 2018
#266
No...by not being a democrat? Are you kidding me with that shit? He ran as a democrat IN the primary
JCanete
Nov 2018
#59
Why would you say such a thing that is so easily verifiable as being untrue?!?!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2018
#181
Fair enough... no worries. I was just a little surprised, because you seem
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2018
#186
I didn't post this to divide Democrats. Bernie Sanders is an issue that we may have to deal
Mrs. Overall
Nov 2018
#7
If I had the time I would find the posts I have here and elsewhere that say
Eliot Rosewater
Nov 2018
#53
As of this AM, he couldn't sell out the 1500 seat Town Hall for the kick-off of his book tour today
lapucelle
Nov 2018
#136
VividSeats has 248 tickets available (an hour after the start) with $45 Orchestra tickets...
George II
Nov 2018
#144
It's an odd mix of cynicism toward Democrats (beholden to corporations and wealthy donors)
betsuni
Nov 2018
#205
My wife missed the first half of the View today. She asked, "did I miss anything?"
George II
Nov 2018
#180
He's not an issue to deal with. He's another potential candidate in the democratic field.
JCanete
Nov 2018
#60
What I meant was if he runs as an Independent (that would make it the "issue").
Mrs. Overall
Nov 2018
#65
Okay, but I think it highly highly improbable that he would run as an independent. He knows that
JCanete
Nov 2018
#68
He doesn't run as an Independent because "it would split the vote," Dems have $$ and Marketing.
ehrnst
Nov 2018
#208
Nonsense, that has nothing to do with why he runs as a democrat in Vermont. I know that
JCanete
Nov 2018
#222
There are obstacles to him running as a Democrat, not the least of which is the requirement....
George II
Nov 2018
#149
Most likely. After all, he's negotiated a methodology whereby he gets the "Democratic"...
George II
Nov 2018
#226
Oh, Bernie's running all right... he's ranked only behind Biden in potential candidates
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2018
#188
in terms of him running as a Dem ...... But Sanders IS NOT a Democrat. He is an Independent.
trueblue2007
Nov 2018
#192
Yes, I only support DEMOCRATS. That is until something better comes along and I can ASSURE
Eliot Rosewater
Nov 2018
#55
"I only support DEMOCRATS." Why shouldn't we be allowed, expected to say and feel this?
Wintryjade
Nov 2018
#102
Sanders adopted Clinton college and minimum wage progression. Clinton really did not do much moving
Wintryjade
Nov 2018
#121
minimum 5 or 7 years FULL tax returns before even considering allowing anyone to run
Eliot Rosewater
Nov 2018
#64
He won't put out his taxes. After successfully not doing it in 2016, he is comfortable that is not
Wintryjade
Nov 2018
#83
You're right about that, but, I do think the right thing for Bernie & others to do is put out
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2018
#184
His policy platforms are the Democratic Party's position for a couple decades.
Wintryjade
Nov 2018
#88
I believe they should be transparent, also. Another thing I admires our Democrat Leaders,
Wintryjade
Nov 2018
#99
Some states are requiring showing your tax return before they can be on the ballot.
redstatebluegirl
Nov 2018
#16
Which states have done that if you know? Are they substantial enough to make it so
Eliot Rosewater
Nov 2018
#66
According to Axios there are 25 that have either done it or are preparing to do it. It is aimed at
redstatebluegirl
Nov 2018
#98
Thanks, and it may well turn out to be unconstitutional. The interesting thing will be to see WHO
Eliot Rosewater
Nov 2018
#109
The midterms are over. It's time for the Democratic Party to get its act together
aikoaiko
Nov 2018
#21
Sorry Bernie, you are not the best candidate. Whether justified or not you would create division
still_one
Nov 2018
#22
...right...because polling showed him first or second last time around. The shit people make up here
JCanete
Nov 2018
#74
no evidence that he was going to be more than a blip when he ran. yeah, sure, technically thats
JCanete
Nov 2018
#93
Actually we had no idea how loud that segment would be. That he generated all that
JCanete
Nov 2018
#96
Yes of course, he saw at least the potential of being able to generate influence. That's not knowing
JCanete
Nov 2018
#105
that's not an effective logic. Yeah, and Freaks and Geeks was guaranteed to attract anybody
JCanete
Nov 2018
#114
I'm not going to go through all of his votes, but there are many that were NOT in line...
George II
Nov 2018
#140
The only other Senator to vote against the Russia sanctions was Rand Paul. That tells me a lot.
George II
Nov 2018
#146
ooh thankfully finally somebody pointed out the irrelevant detail that he doesn't put a d after his
JCanete
Nov 2018
#63
Staged comments designed to hold his dwindling base together while keeping money coming in. N/T
WeekiWater
Nov 2018
#36
scorched earth would be running 3rd party in the General. Did he do that last time? This is silly.
JCanete
Nov 2018
#72
oh jesus..are you pulling out that stupid metric? Do you understand it before you just quote it
JCanete
Nov 2018
#73
This is where I am, keep asking. I really can't see the Democratic party welcoming him for the 3rd
Wintryjade
Nov 2018
#80
As an Independent or a Democrat and does the Democratic Party simply allow him to run
Wintryjade
Nov 2018
#71
Let's see what happens: but I think he will pass on his mantle to a younger progressive
andym
Nov 2018
#82
He didn't have the votes then and he especially does not have the votes now.
Wintryjade
Nov 2018
#86
I do not define them as progressives. I see progressive with our Democratic Leaders.
Wintryjade
Nov 2018
#101
Interesting...I totally disagree with you on Sanders economic populism, and think its
JCanete
Nov 2018
#95
He should if that's the case, but it probably won't be just like 2016. He may not be our
brewens
Nov 2018
#252