Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: AOC and other new House progressives are tweeting their dissatisfaction with orientation at Harvard [View all]Hortensis
(58,785 posts)101. :) Same right back. Here's a reminder for anyone
around of why we need the Democratic Party to be successful. This statement is carefully nonpartisan but, like healthcare reform, this is strictly a Democratic Party commitment and the Republicans will fight almost all the bills in this package tooth and nail.
CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS STATEMENT: Houses Democracy Reform Package Offers Once-in-a-Generation Opportunity to Curb Culture of Corruption
Today, U.S. House of Representatives leadership and newly elected members of Congress announced the framework for the democracy reform bill that will become H.R. 1 in the new Congress.
The historic legislative package contains bold solutions to reduce big money and dark money in politics; impose stronger ethics restrictions on public officials; and strengthen voting rights to empower American voters.
The Center for American Progress has long advocated for anti-corruption policies and has been a leading member of the Declaration for American Democracy, a diverse coalition of more than 100 organizations representing millions of Americans, that is demanding strong, clear solutions to make our democracy more representative of everyday Americans.
Following the announcement of the bill, Michael Sozan, senior fellow at CAP, released the following statement:
Today, U.S. House of Representatives leadership and newly elected members of Congress announced the framework for the democracy reform bill that will become H.R. 1 in the new Congress.
The historic legislative package contains bold solutions to reduce big money and dark money in politics; impose stronger ethics restrictions on public officials; and strengthen voting rights to empower American voters.
The Center for American Progress has long advocated for anti-corruption policies and has been a leading member of the Declaration for American Democracy, a diverse coalition of more than 100 organizations representing millions of Americans, that is demanding strong, clear solutions to make our democracy more representative of everyday Americans.
Following the announcement of the bill, Michael Sozan, senior fellow at CAP, released the following statement:
Voters sent an unmistakable message in the November midterm elections: The culture of corruption in Washington is out of control and must be fixed. Congress now has a once-in-a-generation opportunity to unrig the system with this comprehensive legislative package. The legislations bold solutions represent a giant step forward toward returning power to people, so that the government and the economy work for everybody, not just millionaires and corporations.
As Congress debates this legislation, members must be willing to take bold steps to block the avenues for corruption that rot our government and prevent progress for people, such as the huge hauls of money raised by lobbyists that give corporations improper power over policymaking. Banning lobbyists from fundraising for politicians would help change corrupting incentives and clearly show the American people that their elected representatives work for them.
Those 3 main foci include various bills each. Although reversing Citizens United will take constitutional amendment, we will be able to undermine its power in various ways, including increasing publicly funded elections at both the state and federal levels.
Only 4 of about the 88 or so members of the Democratic Progressive Caucus -- all believers in getting money out of politics -- were able to refuse big donor money in 2016 because most represent lower-income districts that don't donate enough to elect anyone. We can fix that.
Public funding will above all help create clear choices in voters' minds, making it very questionable not to be publicly funded. We also plan to require disclosure of "dark" money donations, who and how much. And, of course, we're going to close the hole the Republicans wrote making it legal for their PACs to take money from foreign powers.
Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
180 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
AOC and other new House progressives are tweeting their dissatisfaction with orientation at Harvard [View all]
sl8
Dec 2018
OP
Lol. The American Enterprise Institute? They are almost solely responsible for inventing Tea Baggers
Hassin Bin Sober
Dec 2018
#99
Did you read who the speakers are keeping in mind that there are both D's and R's Members-elect
bottomofthehill
Dec 2018
#140
Ok, you proved your point. There are many very strong democrats in the speaker lineup.
Blue_true
Dec 2018
#166
I have been lucky in my life to talk to many Freshman Members of Congress
bottomofthehill
Dec 2018
#167
Whose bad idea was it to corporate force-feed AOC, Pressley, Tlaib et al?
BeyondGeography
Dec 2018
#6
+1! Nothing like fresh, un-compromised, un-indoctrinated minds to question the status quo!
flibbitygiblets
Dec 2018
#27
This headline was actually better than most in that regard, but I generally agree.
Tom Rinaldo
Dec 2018
#23
Doesn't look like she's keeping her head down, and I don't think she should.
Cuthbert Allgood
Dec 2018
#41
I am also proud of her for speaking out - she is definitely a social media person
womanofthehills
Dec 2018
#116
Surely you're not including me in the category of people you think are "attacking" her
EffieBlack
Dec 2018
#123
Generally agree. Some of the other freshwomen should take turns being the leader
flibbitygiblets
Dec 2018
#30
On the contrary, they're speaking up because they know very well what they're up against
BeyondGeography
Dec 2018
#28
I'm having a hard time understanding your point? You seem to be saying these rookies would be
KPN
Dec 2018
#64
Yes, and they're implying that there are existing members who don't want the same things they do.
LisaM
Dec 2018
#103
"I know you've heard this a million times before, but..." probably isn't the best way
Cuthbert Allgood
Dec 2018
#106
You said she needs to recognize those who have done what she is doing. I showed she did.
Cuthbert Allgood
Dec 2018
#125
You are absolutely Correct! We do not have to shut up because the RW Media
True Blue American
Dec 2018
#153
I guess the words "the larger group who don't understand they are being fed right wing propaganda"
EffieBlack
Dec 2018
#127
Nice of the former head of Goldman Sachs to clue them in on who really runs things...
PoliticAverse
Dec 2018
#24
Way to shine a spotlight on where corruption starts! Way to ACTUALLY drain a fucking swamp, ladies!
flibbitygiblets
Dec 2018
#32
Sorry, but this is bullshit. If they really wanted to make an impact, they should attend the
still_one
Dec 2018
#31
I think after the 4th CEO came in to tell me how to do my job, I'd tell others too, and then leave
flibbitygiblets
Dec 2018
#34
I got the impression that they didn't even attend the orientation? Is that correct?
still_one
Dec 2018
#35
"Lobbyists are here. Goldman Sachs is here." From the use of the words "is here" and "are here"
Autumn
Dec 2018
#43
OK, but I would like to know if they at least attended the event initially. I can understand them
still_one
Dec 2018
#47
Then I am cool with that. My disdain toward Elaine Chao go back to the bush administration where
still_one
Dec 2018
#69
I do not believe my Rep Lori Trahan would refuse to attend and not listen. Anything I've heard
seaglass
Dec 2018
#50
That is fine, I just was curious if they had at least initially attended the orientation, or did
still_one
Dec 2018
#57
So what do you think Goldman Sachs was going to tell them that was worthwhile?
Cuthbert Allgood
Dec 2018
#55
Don't throw nonesense at me implying that I agree that lobbyists should be at the orientation, I
still_one
Dec 2018
#65
If you are fighting for a specific Agenda, it helps to know what you are dealing with
still_one
Dec 2018
#130
I NEVER said one should be polite and silent. All I said is it would serve their interests to at
still_one
Dec 2018
#77
I'm trying to understand your rationale for saying this is BS. It seems to be nothing more than
KPN
Dec 2018
#83
The network evening news often includes a regular business report, but
PoindexterOglethorpe
Dec 2018
#38
Information about wages, about job training, about jobs that are available,
PoindexterOglethorpe
Dec 2018
#148
Good news for modern man! This is exactly what AOC was elected to do. Kudos to her and
KPN
Dec 2018
#70
Yes, but this is the kind of thing she ran on. Giving power back to the people. Fighting
JCanete
Dec 2018
#105
Goldman Sachs again, just trying to help make government work better? AOC is never going
jalan48
Dec 2018
#76
This is not an attendance mandatory program. I think the Members-Elect actually pay to attend
bottomofthehill
Dec 2018
#82
I'm loving our new freshman representatives! Some real fighters in this group
Devil Child
Dec 2018
#145