Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: FFS! What is it that people DO NOT UNDERSTAND about 67 Senate votes to Impeach! [View all]Bucky
(55,334 posts)75. You need to quit thinking of impeachment and removal in criminal terms
Best. It's a political Act.
No one goes to prison for being impeached and removed from office. It is a political Act for a political problem. The utility of impeachment lies entirely in it's political effectiveness. As long as Republicans love their party above the nation, it will be a wasted effort.
You have to wait for all the facts to come in, and you have to wait for a stronger consensus to build against Trump. Everybody that you're arguing with about impeachment in DU is in favor of Trump being gone. The only point of argument is whether the attempt is made effectively or impulsively
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
157 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
FFS! What is it that people DO NOT UNDERSTAND about 67 Senate votes to Impeach! [View all]
sheshe2
Dec 2018
OP
Because Senators Goldwater and Scott informed him he had only 15 votes on his side /nt
LongtimeAZDem
Dec 2018
#18
I hope you're not suggesting letting a criminal owned by Russia stay in office...
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#54
I fear that a "reconciliation" phase without the "truth" part will be the outcome
erronis
Dec 2018
#146
67 Senate votes to remove. Impeachment is the name for the thing that the House does.
RockRaven
Dec 2018
#5
Trump lost by 3 million votes. He's locked at 40% approval. We retook the House
Azathoth
Dec 2018
#10
I agree. The House must hold a criminal accountable & try to protect the country.
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#62
In other words, do your duty. Just like the repulicons were doing with ACA, Benghazi, emails...
erronis
Dec 2018
#147
I think the public opinion factors into the calculation the GOP will have to make
BannonsLiver
Dec 2018
#90
We should do our constitutional duty regardless of whether the Senate does theirs.
ooky
Dec 2018
#19
True! And what about mueller findings. Are we just gonna nibble around the edges? This whole ide
Laura PourMeADrink
Dec 2018
#123
I agree, we should NOT talk about impeachment now. It is premature. However, after the Mueller
still_one
Dec 2018
#28
Actually you brought up an even better point which needed emphasis. It would draw attention to the
still_one
Dec 2018
#92
I agree. If he committed high crimes & misdemeanors, it is the House's duty to impeach.
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#45
I think there will be a backlash, if we don't move to do the proper, legal thing.
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#72
If he committed high crimes & misdemeanors, we must proceed w/the lawful recourse.
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#40
I see your point. But I'm not talking politics. We HAVE to impeach, if there is clear evidence.
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#57
I'm right there with you, sheshe.For a supposedly reality-based forum, there are fantasies galore...
Hekate
Dec 2018
#41
I don't care what it looks like. But we have to do the right thing & impeach...
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#50
That's what I responding to. Apparently, you want us to walk on eggshells for the
John Fante
Dec 2018
#156
Wait until the real news of what Mueller knows comes out. It may be quite alarming, and
C Moon
Dec 2018
#44
Exactly. That is the correct answer when asked about impeachment...the mueller probe is not
Laura PourMeADrink
Dec 2018
#126
FFS, It's about principle, it's about taking a stand, it's about doing THE RIGHT THING
Fiendish Thingy
Dec 2018
#56
+1. Democrats have no control over the Senate, but a Democratic-controlled House must do its duty.
dalton99a
Dec 2018
#66
I'll respectfully push back on that. What if prosecutors let every criminal off the hook
ecstatic
Dec 2018
#80
This is a case of having half the jurors that you know in advance will NOT vote to convict
DFW
Dec 2018
#87
I agree with you She. For all the talk of "principles" & "constitutional duty", impeachment plays..
Tarheel_Dem
Dec 2018
#88
Impeachment can be used as a tactic in run up to 2020 election, all about timing
beachbum bob
Dec 2018
#96
What I understand is we're furnishing trump with aid and comfort he in no way deserves.
Paladin
Dec 2018
#113
Impeachment requires a majority of the House. Conviction and removal require 67 Senators.
Squinch
Dec 2018
#115
Totally disagree. Who cares if we don't have the votes. We must stand up regardless. Nt
Laura PourMeADrink
Dec 2018
#120
The problem is they want impeachment to happen two seconds after we take over the House...
Iggo
Dec 2018
#122
This defeatist language is what has soured voters on the Democratic Party for decades
Zorro
Dec 2018
#124
Impeachment (House) vs removal (Senate). We must impeach, ideally when we can remove. (n/t)
FreepFryer
Dec 2018
#136