Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: FFS! What is it that people DO NOT UNDERSTAND about 67 Senate votes to Impeach! [View all]oberliner
(58,724 posts)143. Did you seriously just type that Nixon wasn't a narcissist?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
157 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
FFS! What is it that people DO NOT UNDERSTAND about 67 Senate votes to Impeach! [View all]
sheshe2
Dec 2018
OP
Because Senators Goldwater and Scott informed him he had only 15 votes on his side /nt
LongtimeAZDem
Dec 2018
#18
I hope you're not suggesting letting a criminal owned by Russia stay in office...
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#54
I fear that a "reconciliation" phase without the "truth" part will be the outcome
erronis
Dec 2018
#146
67 Senate votes to remove. Impeachment is the name for the thing that the House does.
RockRaven
Dec 2018
#5
Trump lost by 3 million votes. He's locked at 40% approval. We retook the House
Azathoth
Dec 2018
#10
I agree. The House must hold a criminal accountable & try to protect the country.
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#62
In other words, do your duty. Just like the repulicons were doing with ACA, Benghazi, emails...
erronis
Dec 2018
#147
I think the public opinion factors into the calculation the GOP will have to make
BannonsLiver
Dec 2018
#90
We should do our constitutional duty regardless of whether the Senate does theirs.
ooky
Dec 2018
#19
True! And what about mueller findings. Are we just gonna nibble around the edges? This whole ide
Laura PourMeADrink
Dec 2018
#123
I agree, we should NOT talk about impeachment now. It is premature. However, after the Mueller
still_one
Dec 2018
#28
Actually you brought up an even better point which needed emphasis. It would draw attention to the
still_one
Dec 2018
#92
I agree. If he committed high crimes & misdemeanors, it is the House's duty to impeach.
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#45
I think there will be a backlash, if we don't move to do the proper, legal thing.
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#72
If he committed high crimes & misdemeanors, we must proceed w/the lawful recourse.
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#40
I see your point. But I'm not talking politics. We HAVE to impeach, if there is clear evidence.
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#57
I'm right there with you, sheshe.For a supposedly reality-based forum, there are fantasies galore...
Hekate
Dec 2018
#41
I don't care what it looks like. But we have to do the right thing & impeach...
Honeycombe8
Dec 2018
#50
That's what I responding to. Apparently, you want us to walk on eggshells for the
John Fante
Dec 2018
#156
Wait until the real news of what Mueller knows comes out. It may be quite alarming, and
C Moon
Dec 2018
#44
Exactly. That is the correct answer when asked about impeachment...the mueller probe is not
Laura PourMeADrink
Dec 2018
#126
FFS, It's about principle, it's about taking a stand, it's about doing THE RIGHT THING
Fiendish Thingy
Dec 2018
#56
+1. Democrats have no control over the Senate, but a Democratic-controlled House must do its duty.
dalton99a
Dec 2018
#66
I'll respectfully push back on that. What if prosecutors let every criminal off the hook
ecstatic
Dec 2018
#80
This is a case of having half the jurors that you know in advance will NOT vote to convict
DFW
Dec 2018
#87
I agree with you She. For all the talk of "principles" & "constitutional duty", impeachment plays..
Tarheel_Dem
Dec 2018
#88
Impeachment can be used as a tactic in run up to 2020 election, all about timing
beachbum bob
Dec 2018
#96
What I understand is we're furnishing trump with aid and comfort he in no way deserves.
Paladin
Dec 2018
#113
Impeachment requires a majority of the House. Conviction and removal require 67 Senators.
Squinch
Dec 2018
#115
Totally disagree. Who cares if we don't have the votes. We must stand up regardless. Nt
Laura PourMeADrink
Dec 2018
#120
The problem is they want impeachment to happen two seconds after we take over the House...
Iggo
Dec 2018
#122
This defeatist language is what has soured voters on the Democratic Party for decades
Zorro
Dec 2018
#124
Impeachment (House) vs removal (Senate). We must impeach, ideally when we can remove. (n/t)
FreepFryer
Dec 2018
#136