Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WARNING: Don't misunderestimate him: Santorum may actually be electable. [View all]downwardly_mobile
(137 posts)13. Except that's never going to happen - the Supreme Court would have to overturn Griswold
and other cases from the early 60s at least. The President can't do that. And even if the Supreme Court eventually acted, it would only send it back to the states, who wouldn't do anything either.
It's like Reagan and every Republican President since who, rhetorically, has been entirely anti-choice. The talk is appreciated by the social cons, everyone else ignores it.
And talking hypothetically against birth control might not go over so badly anymore (again, as everyone knows that ban will never happen) -- the Sexual Revolution didn't exactly work out to be the happiness machine it promised to be. Just ask almost anyone you know who's single in the 21st century.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WARNING: Don't misunderestimate him: Santorum may actually be electable. [View all]
downwardly_mobile
Jan 2012
OP
I doubt he'll last long. Santorum said that he thinks states should be allowed to BAN Birth Control
Tx4obama
Jan 2012
#4
Except that's never going to happen - the Supreme Court would have to overturn Griswold
downwardly_mobile
Jan 2012
#13
Steve Schmitt, repug on MSNBC, said Santorum hit it out of the park with his speech.
elleng
Jan 2012
#6
If santorum is electable, then it is over for the country. It would mean that the country has
still_one
Jan 2012
#14
I sure would rather be up against santorum then Romney. Romney can attract independents, and that
still_one
Jan 2012
#18
Under the right conditions, anyone nominated by one of the two parties can beat an incumbent
stevenleser
Jan 2012
#17
He's not even nearly electable: he lost his Senate seat in a 41-59 blowout cuz he fugged up bigtime
struggle4progress
Jan 2012
#20
Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert would probably be happy if Santorum was the nominee.
Quantess
Jan 2012
#41