Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gothmog

(179,495 posts)
192. sanders has cited the study cited in OP to justify his magical plan and has failed to get it adopted
Thu Dec 13, 2018, 11:12 PM
Dec 2018

Studies like the one cited in the OP are amusing but are not taken seriously by policy makers. If you want to get a single payer plan or one of the other plans cited in the Vox article adopted, then be honest and tell policy makers how much the plan will cost and how you intend to pay for it.

sanders has been citing the study used in the OP and other studies for a long time and has utterly and completely failed to get anyone to adopt his plan. sanders never talks about the cost of his magical plan or how to pay for it which is why he has failed repeatedly. There is a reason why sanders relies on weak studies and will not present actual cost numbers or how he would pay for the program.

If you want to get such a plan adopted, be honest about the costs of such plan and how to pay for it. Using bogus studies that promise magical societal savings will not cut in the real world. As Krugman has noted such studies are similar to the same claims used to justify GOP tax cuts. We were promised by McConnell that the trump tax cut would pay for itself. That claim turned out to be false.

Again, I live in the real world and I know how studies such as the one cited in the OP are put together and how these studies are based on aggressive assumptions. No one in the real world takes these studies seriously. Without a true cost analysis and a way to pay for such a plan, these plans are going no where. Again, sanders has failed to sell his magical plan using these studies for a good reason.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kick dalton99a Dec 2018 #1
Just a question...... essaynnc Dec 2018 #2
How many people made buggy whips? guillaumeb Dec 2018 #3
+1 red dog 1 Dec 2018 #36
Those jobs were not erased overnight, or even over 15 years. MFA says 8 years. ehrnst Dec 2018 #177
Many jobs were erased nearly overnight. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #182
Can you provide some citations on those claims? ehrnst Dec 2018 #184
I guess not... ehrnst Dec 2018 #185
I feel no need to write a book on this topic. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #186
Right. Citing your sources is "writing a book." ehrnst Dec 2018 #187
By that logic, European healthcare systems should employ lots of insurance company workers and Doodley Dec 2018 #202
broken window Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2018 #4
Thanks for that link red dog 1 Dec 2018 #37
welcome; health insurance is not a net benefit Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2018 #44
Most single payer plans include taking care of people currently working in the Poiuyt Dec 2018 #5
You might want to take a look at PNHP's site. area51 Dec 2018 #6
Beat me to it!! Roland99 Dec 2018 #22
They Use Some of the Same Examples I Was Thinking of Leith Dec 2018 #38
They are already being phased out. KentuckyWoman Dec 2018 #9
A great number of people would likely be absorbed in Medicare Takket Dec 2018 #15
Just an answer quakerboy Dec 2018 #28
Don't know and don't care. Politicub Dec 2018 #30
This type of nonsense is now just fodder for ignore. I am so over small minded short sighted spew tymorial Dec 2018 #105
Private insurance may still be needed. Lonestarblue Dec 2018 #31
Yup Leith Dec 2018 #39
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2018 #45
Germany has a system of non-profit/profit health care system... cynatnite Dec 2018 #107
Someone still needs to administer those benefits.... Heartstrings Dec 2018 #126
It should open up more jobs in actual healthcare treestar Dec 2018 #144
That is an economic consequence that has not been addressed in M4A. (tn) ehrnst Dec 2018 #178
I remember when health insurance wasn't even a thing KentuckyWoman Dec 2018 #7
There is an enormous amount of profit to be made in the industry. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #8
we pay for an industry designed to deny Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2018 #11
Exactly. The Insurance companies make their money by denying care. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #13
That used to be true but the gross margin is now capped at 20% grantcart Dec 2018 #34
So ONLY 20% is diverted. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #59
That isn't the issue of the sub thread grantcart Dec 2018 #71
Insurance companies can declare that certain things are costs. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #73
Its not 3% and its not 20% and insurance companies cannot "declare certain things are costs" grantcart Dec 2018 #111
+++ JHan Dec 2018 #125
Amazing Reply Me. Dec 2018 #127
This message was self-deleted by its author grantcart Dec 2018 #131
Thank you grantcart Dec 2018 #138
Great post Gothmog Dec 2018 #200
I've noticed along with co pays and deductibles I am being charged with "facility fees" Autumn Dec 2018 #129
And no one challenges these unexplained costs. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #130
if the insurance company is only gonna get 79% questionseverything Dec 2018 #114
You have it reversed. If they don't spend the 80% then they have to rebate the difference grantcart Dec 2018 #122
Oh, BS! DiverDave Dec 2018 #136
As reply #122 explains Senator Al Franken crafted the perfect solution grantcart Dec 2018 #142
That's simply not true. George II Dec 2018 #132
To be fair it used to be true before the ACA. grantcart Dec 2018 #143
That is no longer the case. Under the ACA the medical loss ratio is capped grantcart Dec 2018 #32
we pay for all health care for everyone + 20% + cost of industry Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2018 #42
ACA margins are NOT based on cost plus margins. grantcart Dec 2018 #52
ACA is a step in the right direction Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2018 #55
Not arguing that we shouldn't transition to single payer but the issue grantcart Dec 2018 #58
If your income is low enough there is a program to pay for that 135 Marrah_Goodman Dec 2018 #67
I don't qualify for that but do qualify for $ 1230 monthly subsidy with ACA. grantcart Dec 2018 #72
Marrah, do you have a link to more info on this. sheshe2 Dec 2018 #82
It's called "Extra Help" Marrah_Goodman Dec 2018 #83
Thank you. sheshe2 Dec 2018 #84
CEOs making 10's of thousands per day. YAY! SammyWinstonJack Dec 2018 #47
possibly worse, Dr. Denial Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2018 #48
Thank you for understanding. KentuckyWoman Dec 2018 #51
I felt that your meaning was clear. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #60
How often do those things happen? quakerboy Dec 2018 #29
And then there are people like me. Stonepounder Dec 2018 #33
I didn't mean to blame the patient... only that for profit preys on that sort of thing KentuckyWoman Dec 2018 #50
Supported Medicare-for-All - actually MediCAID-for-All - since about 1980, as right thing to do. Hoyt Dec 2018 #10
There is also much waste in the pharmaceutical industry. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #14
No question, but that is built into the 14%. The study assumes the system is transformed. Hoyt Dec 2018 #16
The military budget, or more properly the war budget, guillaumeb Dec 2018 #19
I'm for it! ananda Dec 2018 #12
We will slowly get there for this reason. shockey80 Dec 2018 #17
Unfortunately this study is an oversimplification. Many who read these studies.... George II Dec 2018 #18
Medicare advantage is already there. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #20
That is correct. Medicare Advantage is VERY affordable (my wife and I each pay $25/month), but.... George II Dec 2018 #21
Agreed that Medicare also needs to be fixed. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #23
The only fixing I see that Medicare needs is to provide full coverage, not just 80%, but... George II Dec 2018 #27
With Medicare Advantage you are somewhat limited in your choice of hostalover Dec 2018 #49
"They are much more efficient than the US Government would be" dpibel Dec 2018 #56
Example: George II Dec 2018 #70
That article doesn't mention Medicare once, and the Pentagon is rather infamous... Humanist_Activist Dec 2018 #87
The government is the government, regardless of the department or branch. George II Dec 2018 #88
So in your view, the government is incapable of running things efficiently? Humanist_Activist Dec 2018 #89
There is no "evidence as applied to Medicare" because a big part of Medicare is administered.... George II Dec 2018 #92
Ok, what about equivalent systems, such as the VA or Medicaid? Humanist_Activist Dec 2018 #94
I have further questions, is this problem unique to the United States? Humanist_Activist Dec 2018 #90
I do not think what you think I think dpibel Dec 2018 #99
It was only a matter of time Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2018 #155
The study proposes a 3.75% national sales tax as a possible way to fund the $1,000,000,000,000 lapucelle Dec 2018 #112
Sales taxes are the most regressive taxes ever conceived.... George II Dec 2018 #113
guess you missed the exemptions part questionseverything Dec 2018 #117
What I missed was the specifics of the vague plan. So, is there anything proposed on how.... George II Dec 2018 #120
That's ridiculous. The sales tax is collected (or not) by the merchants. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2018 #148
VATs are very regressive Gothmog Dec 2018 #149
It may also help to read we were discussing a sales tax. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2018 #152
You do know that a VAT is a sales tax Gothmog Dec 2018 #153
Bizarre. A sales tax is a sales tax and a value added tax is a value added tax. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2018 #154
That is so cute and adorable Gothmog Dec 2018 #156
Lol. Your own link contradicts how and why you jumped in to this silly subthread asserting.... Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2018 #157
LOL-they are both taxes on consumption and both taxes are eventually paid for by the consumer Gothmog Dec 2018 #158
And the regressive nature of the tax is that it's based on consumption (however one may define that) George II Dec 2018 #161
The Fair Tax proposal attempts to lessen the regressive effect with pre-bates Gothmog Dec 2018 #162
A sales tax has been determined to be the most regressive tax possible, except for a poll tax.... George II Dec 2018 #159
Using a very regressive tax to pay for this plan is a bad idea Gothmog Dec 2018 #163
This plan has no chance of passing in the real world Gothmog Dec 2018 #166
I don't know where you are, but in the four states in which I've lived (NY, NJ, OH, CT).... George II Dec 2018 #160
We have one percentage for the state tax but there are different tax rates for local taxes Gothmog Dec 2018 #172
That is a very regressive form of taxation Gothmog Dec 2018 #116
Actually based on studies done for the ACA, it costs 13% less for the govt to do cbdo2007 Dec 2018 #167
You are using facts concerning a study that is based on very aggresive assumptions Gothmog Dec 2018 #175
That's why the elite in general don't like it sandensea Dec 2018 #24
Cui bono. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #25
+1 sandensea Dec 2018 #26
Yeah but then it wouldn't keep people trapped working for their employers linuxuser3 Dec 2018 #35
What does Medicare for All have to do with Native American Genocide or Slavery? red dog 1 Dec 2018 #40
Welcome to DU. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #61
I worked for almost 50 years, never had a problem changing jobs because I was trapped by healthcare. George II Dec 2018 #145
Single Payer Is Good For Business Progressive2020 Dec 2018 #41
Yes, it is. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #62
True Progressive2020 Dec 2018 #78
Agreed. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #79
if we all had medicare wouldn't the cost of workmans comp questionseverything Dec 2018 #119
K&R, thanks for posting red dog 1 Dec 2018 #43
While I support medicare for all there are significant errors on the percentage grantcart Dec 2018 #46
Societal savings are not tax revenues Gothmog Dec 2018 #53
Taxes will go higher, guillaumeb Dec 2018 #63
Then why has sanders failed utterly to get his magic plan adopted in Vermont? Gothmog Dec 2018 #74
Nothing is perfect. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #75
Then sanders should stop selling his book and go work to get this plan adopted in vermont Gothmog Dec 2018 #118
Guilaumeb, Sanders did not have a workable plan Hortensis Dec 2018 #176
In my view, Sanders is helping to frame the issue. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #181
I understand some of the savings will come from funeral costs of those with inadequate... George II Dec 2018 #69
All the comparisons are with countries that have a fraction of the population of the US.... George II Dec 2018 #81
That actually makes no sense, any insurance system is more cost effective... Humanist_Activist Dec 2018 #86
Yep. That's the most asinine argument against single payer that gets thrown around. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2018 #150
I have yet to see how it is paid for. wasupaloopa Dec 2018 #54
What I would like to see is the House dems ooky Dec 2018 #57
Maybe a progressive think tank can do it. wasupaloopa Dec 2018 #65
Those who wrote the plan and are pushing it should explain how it works and is paid for.... George II Dec 2018 #85
OK, let's strengthen the ACA then... Humanist_Activist Dec 2018 #96
The biggest fault in the ACA is allowing individual states to implement it differently.... George II Dec 2018 #98
True, but your going to have to abolish Federalism or find a way to Federalize the ACA... Humanist_Activist Dec 2018 #102
i swear no one did the math on the aca before passing it questionseverything Dec 2018 #121
One of the issues is I think it still allows for age based discrimination... Humanist_Activist Dec 2018 #123
true single pyer would be better but medicare for all is a decent starting place questionseverything Dec 2018 #124
Strengthening an already existing system rather than start from scratch is common sense to me. betsuni Dec 2018 #103
Its a good, marketable term, also, the ACA, due to the structure... Humanist_Activist Dec 2018 #109
I don't disagree with strengthening the ACA as an intermediate step. ooky Dec 2018 #104
Your taxes would increase. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #64
Yes. It would cost a business $11k per employee per year. They pay that or more now. KWR65 Dec 2018 #66
And increased taxes should be less than Americans currently pay for insurance premiums. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #68
If the savings are so clear, then why have this plan not been put into effect? Gothmog Dec 2018 #76
Bribes from the Insurance industry to politicians. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #77
Ding, Ding, Ding, we have a winna!! nt Ferrets are Cool Dec 2018 #108
Unfortunately every time it gets down to specifically stating how the plan would be paid for and.... George II Dec 2018 #95
Only if the hypothetical or theoritical savings are real Gothmog Dec 2018 #115
Why do you keep using the word magical? guillaumeb Dec 2018 #128
Because I live in the real world and I also know how studies like the one cited in OP are prepared Gothmog Dec 2018 #133
I know it's two years old, but the third paragraph in your link is very interesting. George II Dec 2018 #135
Agreed Gothmog Dec 2018 #137
That statistic is false dansolo Dec 2018 #165
It is a single payer system in which each province guillaumeb Dec 2018 #168
K&R lilactime Dec 2018 #80
Yep. Thanks for posting! BeckyDem Dec 2018 #91
Thank you. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #93
In solidarity! BeckyDem Dec 2018 #97
I would recommend making this source part of a separate post. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #100
Please, feel free to use the source in any way you prefer. BeckyDem Dec 2018 #101
Hell, you can't even get them to do something about climate change... Ferrets are Cool Dec 2018 #106
Voters made a difference a few weeks ago. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #110
Voters voted to protect the ACA and the coverage of pre-existing conditions Gothmog Dec 2018 #134
They voted for an imperfect something guillaumeb Dec 2018 #139
The voters did NOT vote for sanders magical single payer plan Gothmog Dec 2018 #140
Sounds like a meme. "Magical single payer". But it ignores reality. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #141
Single payer was not on the ballot but protection of pre-existing coverage was an important issue Gothmog Dec 2018 #146
This study is really sad and shows why single payer has been adopted Gothmog Dec 2018 #147
. Achilleaze Dec 2018 #151
K&R.. disillusioned73 Dec 2018 #164
The only way forward that is not just left wing debate on sites like DU GulfCoast66 Dec 2018 #169
The ACA is, at best, a temporary fix. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #170
The French system has non profit insurance companies people can choose from GulfCoast66 Dec 2018 #171
Or (in terms Republicans can understand) the cost of 3 wars Bucky Dec 2018 #173
War is very profitable, guillaumeb Dec 2018 #183
This plan will require 60 votes in the Senate Gothmog Dec 2018 #174
And then, how does the Democratic Party protect it when not in power? ehrnst Dec 2018 #179
His isn't the only proposal for reform using public programs ehrnst Dec 2018 #180
The sanders plan relies on tax increases to pay for it Gothmog Dec 2018 #188
Which will effectively reduce insurance premiums guillaumeb Dec 2018 #189
Only if the aggressive assumptions in the study are correct Gothmog Dec 2018 #190
So only in the US, as opoosed to every other country with single payer, guillaumeb Dec 2018 #191
sanders has cited the study cited in OP to justify his magical plan and has failed to get it adopted Gothmog Dec 2018 #192
Don't forget the overall savings of funeral costs for people who have inadequate healthcare!! George II Dec 2018 #193
Nicely done. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #194
... George II Dec 2018 #195
The Medicare-for-all paradox Gothmog Dec 2018 #196
Most people might be reasonably happy, guillaumeb Dec 2018 #197
I live in the real world Gothmog Dec 2018 #198
Your observation is correct, as far as it goes. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #199
There are very valid reasons why President Obama got the ACA adopted Gothmog Dec 2018 #201
Getting to the ACA was very difficult too and also started unpopularly, and the very same complaint JCanete Dec 2018 #203
Agreed. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #204
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Study Shows Medicare ...»Reply #192