Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WeekiWater

(3,259 posts)
3. Medicare for all might not be the universal health care legislation that makes it.
Mon Dec 17, 2018, 04:31 PM
Dec 2018

It's not the only option out there. I don't see why it's so upsetting that he doesn't endorse something now that might not be what makes it in the end. He wouldn't endorse single payer. I am for single payer but am not upset at him for his position here. He made it clear he wants everyone covered. I like medicare for all but none of us know what that will look like once opened up. There are enormous variables. I find those stating that is the the best and cheapest to be using a bit of slight of hand in order to sell what they want. If we are going to do medicare for all it needs to be drastically overhauled and that overhaul will mean a lot more expenses. Right now medicare leaves far too much out and comes with what could be considered regressive taxes in order to fill gaps.

“Does Chuck know that free is the cheapest?” asked The Intercept’s Michael Whitney, alluding to the fact that Sanders’ Medicare for All plan would eliminate premiums, co-pays, and deductibles while providing comprehensive coverage to every American.

I find that to be far more offensive than anything Shumer said.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Schumer says he's for the...»Reply #3