Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LakeSuperiorView

(1,533 posts)
55. My nephew got cited for having a lethal level of alcohol on his breath.
Tue Dec 18, 2018, 10:47 AM
Dec 2018

He argued that the breathalyzer gave an inaccurate reading, which the judge conceded. But since the charge was underage drinking - it was a house party so no vehicles were involved, he was found guilty and had to pay a fine.

Breathalyzers stored in the trunk of a police vehicle in cold weather can be very inaccurate until warmed to room temperature. My nehew was the first person tested and like I mentioned the result was a level that would be lethal, if I remember correctly it was approaching 2% - not 0.2% but an actual stone cold dead 2%. Now that result showed have immediately suspect and thrown out at the scene, but since the level was not relevant, the presence was all that mattered.

If we want to get "Nanny State", auto video cameras have become ridiculously cheap. And an integrated accelerometer and all we are missing is software to analyze the video to look for dangerous driving.

As you note, the goal is to remove bad driving.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

In addition, any detectable coffee. Sneederbunk Dec 2018 #1
I was going to say: Aristus Dec 2018 #7
why not lower it to .00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001? maxsolomon Dec 2018 #2
It's more about filling private prisons and revenue BannonsLiver Dec 2018 #4
Its Utah so IDK maxsolomon Dec 2018 #18
Not low enough. LiberalFighter Dec 2018 #20
So, make it illegal for production and consumption? maxsolomon Dec 2018 #22
Just for Utah. Since they want to violate the Constitution. LiberalFighter Dec 2018 #42
.05? Cirque du So-What Dec 2018 #3
Good. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2018 #5
No... lame54 Dec 2018 #8
Question: maxsolomon Dec 2018 #17
Sounds good to me. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2018 #19
And precisely what good end do you prophecize coming from this? LanternWaste Dec 2018 #26
He gets to feel good about himself Downtown Hound Dec 2018 #31
that's precisely who is the biggest risk maxsolomon Dec 2018 #36
Wow, you really have a vivid imagination. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2018 #38
I remember lots of people saying, "I don't want drugs in my neighborhood," Downtown Hound Dec 2018 #39
Tired drivers? Distracted drivers? Depressed drivers? nt USALiberal Dec 2018 #41
In other words, no logic in your decision. Got it. nt USALiberal Dec 2018 #40
And capital punishment. dalton99a Dec 2018 #24
One drink is now impairment for me Rorey Dec 2018 #6
Anecdotal. It is possible to drink alcohol and drive afterwards. maxsolomon Dec 2018 #15
Absolutely right. Rorey Dec 2018 #35
A regular cocktail is 1 standard drink, not 2 TexasBushwhacker Dec 2018 #49
Okay, here's my (mostly) joke opinion: Buzzed drivers are the safest drivers out there. Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2018 #9
Only partially zipplewrath Dec 2018 #12
"People modify their behavior towards safety." Rorey Dec 2018 #37
Out of control zipplewrath Dec 2018 #10
Thanks, Zipplewrath maxsolomon Dec 2018 #23
Thank you Downtown Hound Dec 2018 #29
In America, if the risk is not 0% maxsolomon Dec 2018 #32
Yup zipplewrath Dec 2018 #51
Cringe worthy zipplewrath Dec 2018 #33
.05% is the limit for most of Europe already Major Nikon Dec 2018 #45
There's alot of question zipplewrath Dec 2018 #47
What you're describing is actually a pretty good argument for changing the standard Major Nikon Dec 2018 #48
But those other factors would have to be present zipplewrath Dec 2018 #50
Occupying a motor vehicle is the most dangerous activity the vast majority of us do Major Nikon Dec 2018 #54
Not even close zipplewrath Dec 2018 #60
14% of the population smokes Major Nikon Dec 2018 #62
At any one time zipplewrath Dec 2018 #63
It already has Major Nikon Dec 2018 #64
Between 0.05 and 0.08? zipplewrath Dec 2018 #67
My nephew got cited for having a lethal level of alcohol on his breath. LakeSuperiorView Dec 2018 #55
I was disabled by a drunk driver nini Dec 2018 #59
How drunk? zipplewrath Dec 2018 #61
Someone had better warn Brett Kavanaugh Ohiogal Dec 2018 #11
being from drunken wisconsin that would not go over well here dembotoz Dec 2018 #13
CDL class limit is .04%. Kittycow Dec 2018 #14
Don't drink and drive. NT WeekiWater Dec 2018 #16
That pretty much sums it up! There are so many options now there is no excuse for Luciferous Dec 2018 #21
At 0.050 I don't care. zipplewrath Dec 2018 #27
This is in line melm00se Dec 2018 #25
Kinda zipplewrath Dec 2018 #28
Europe also has amazing and affordable public transportation Downtown Hound Dec 2018 #43
I have no problem with that. Just have a designated driver who won't drink. still_one Dec 2018 #30
I found this chart illuminating: maxsolomon Dec 2018 #34
I can exercise the privileges granted by cloudbase Dec 2018 #44
I always thought the rule was... Major Nikon Dec 2018 #46
8 hours from bottle to throttle zipplewrath Dec 2018 #52
Texting or jacking with your cell phone while driving is WORSE........... Bengus81 Dec 2018 #53
The problem in Utah will be selective enforcement. hunter Dec 2018 #56
From this list, most of the world is at the Utah level or below karynnj Dec 2018 #57
I've been to Salt Lake a few times this year, Uber/Lyft is everywhere tritsofme Dec 2018 #58
Australia has had .05 in every state since the 1970s. Saved thousands of lives as statistics showed. BSdetect Dec 2018 #65
Not sure about that zipplewrath Dec 2018 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Utah set to drop blood-al...»Reply #55