IMO the denial of Sweden to guarantee Assange that he will not be sent to the US is enough to

[sabrina 1]

167. Well now you are proving HIS point, his reason for not being willing to trust them.

You just said it. That they wanted to arrest him.

Now please explain exactly why Sweden wanted to arrest him? Is it standard procedure in any Democracy to plot to arrest a witness in an investigation in advance of a decision that there even is a case.? You wouldn't get many witnesses to talk to investigators if all of them faced arrest would you?

Being that there are no charges, there isn't even a case, just an investigation. So, what would they be anticipating arresting him for?? What if he has exculpatory information? We KNOW he does have exculpatory evidence btw because before it was erased from the Internet the whole world was able to see it.

So they have pre-determined what he has to say, the whole 'we want to talk to him re our investigation' is just a ploy to try to get him to Sweden after all. Imagine that, as if we all didn't know this from the beginning.

So now you are admitting that he definitely had something to fear. Sweden, claiming to be conducting an investigation, isn't doing that after all. They plan to arrest him. That is why they want him in Sweden. Maybe they could render him to one the US's favorite Dictatorships, as they did before. Uzbekistan gets paid well by us, they might be willing to oblige now that we've lost some of our torturing friends.

Thank you, it took all these posts to finally get that admission.