General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kirsten Gillibrand and the Al Franken Fury [View all]WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)The Franken letter is a strike against her. I would not hold it against her in a primary but many would. I knew Franken was going down from the time he said "wait". I simply don't hold it against Gillibrand just as I don't hold it against the majority of Democratic Senators who called for him to resign. I find it to be a shame that all of the blame is put on her and the others are ignored. It's a classic example of scapegoating.
I don't simply give Gillibrand a free pass. Although this is her issue, she should not have been the one designated to head up the letter. I believe I am using that word properly considering what we know. Designated. She should not have done that.
She is a great spokesperson for our party and I would love to see her enter the primaries. If your line in the sand is not having calling for Franken to resign then maybe Manchin is your guy. He actually stood up for Franken publicly.
Gillibrand should be viewed as a force, a progressive, a great representative for the issues we care deeply about, and a leader.
Yet there are individuals who called for Franken to resign who possess more political clout than Gillibrand and are in the top three in early primary polling.
All of that and I will tell you that I like Franken more than any person who called for him to resign. Not because they called for him to resign. Because he was flat out great. For those who watched him he was turning into one of those once in a generation Senators. A Lion of the Senate, if you will.