Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

lapfog_1

(32,009 posts)

23. Oh great

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Wed Dec 19, 2018, 02:12 PM

Dec 2018

So now every time I download something from pornhub I have to

1) hire a sleaze bag attorney

2) create a slush fund

3) find a publisher of a tabloid who will do some illegal favors for me

4) Have the publisher pay some amount of money ($10K ought to be enough) to each of the porn actors for their "story" about how I may have downloaded a video they made 10 years ago and then kill the story

5) have my sleaze bag attorney pay the publisher out of my slush fund

6) all so that the porn actors don't run around telling everyone else that I downloaded their video because it might make evangelicals less likely to personally think "he''s a good guy" about me.

Now they tell me... crap. What a PITA.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

LOL-The Federalist: "You're Not Allowed To Knock Trump For Stormy Daniels If You Watch Porn" [View all] kpete Dec 2018 OP

I don't care who Trump slept with HopeAgain Dec 2018 #1

I Care A Little ProfessorGAC Dec 2018 #3

Watching porn vs. paying off a porn star for political cover are very different things flibbitygiblets Dec 2018 #2

Yep irisblue Dec 2018 #8

+1,000 n/t MarcA Dec 2018 #26

Raw-dogging porn stars is quite different too! TheBlackAdder Dec 2018 #29

Some couples watch porn together. I guess they are cheating on each other face to face. wasupaloopa Dec 2018 #4

Swingers? Marcuse Dec 2018 #19

You owe me a new pair of spats. NT mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2018 #5

🤦 now i haveto go read an Federalist article now. irisblue Dec 2018 #6

These clowns should just learn to shut up... Moostache Dec 2018 #7

Making a note for when the View comes back trixie2 Dec 2018 #17

that's idiotic and illogical Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2018 #9

More ridiculous false equivalency than usual YessirAtsaFact Dec 2018 #10

so the federalist is now into the "society made me do it" defense? unblock Dec 2018 #11

Some outstanding points here by posters......... MyOwnPeace Dec 2018 #12

if donnie nukes the planet, it's your fault because you once watched dr. strangelove. unblock Dec 2018 #13

I think I know where the author is trying to go with this. violetpastille Dec 2018 #14

Haha Crutchez_CuiBono Dec 2018 #20

You're Not Allowed To Knock Trump For His Tweets If You Read Twitter dalton99a Dec 2018 #15

This article is the porn-equivalent of "But Her Emails!" DetlefK Dec 2018 #16

Wrong. That's like saying you can't object to crime if you watch crime movies. Liberty Belle Dec 2018 #18

NT Marcuse Dec 2018 #21

A Partisan Rationalization for Illegal Activity dlk Dec 2018 #22

Oh great lapfog_1 Dec 2018 #23

So because I watched "The Italian Job" D_Master81 Dec 2018 #24

Back in the day, I was diagnosed with prostatitis ProudLib72 Dec 2018 #25

I was afflicted with this sometime around age 13... sdfernando Dec 2018 #28

Subsequently and likewise, you're not allowed to spew bullshit if you're the President of the US Firestorm49 Dec 2018 #27

Turns out John Sweeney wasn't just a stupid member of Congress onenote Dec 2018 #30