General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What motivates the outrage over Julian Assange's Political Asylum? [View all]Bodhi BloodWave
(2,346 posts)the woman in question made a report to the police, she described rape according to Swedish law
the police acted on that information as they should.
*looks at your article*
that is a very twisted description of the story i must admit (my rough translation that might not be exactly word for word)
*
Det är helt fel att vi skulle vara rädda för Assange och därför inte velat anmäla, säger kvinnan, han är inte våldsam och jag känner mig inte hotad av honom.
I båda fallen har det handlar om frivillig sex till en början som i ett senare skede övergått i övergrepp.
Den andra kvinnan ville anmäla för våldtäkt. Jag gav min berättelse som vittnesmål till hennes berättelse och för att stötta henne. Vi står fullt ut för uppgifterna, säger kvinnan till Aftonbladet.
*
Its totally wrong that we would be afraid of Assange and therefore not wanting charges, says the woman, he is not violent and i don't feel endangered by him
In both cases its about voluntary sex initially that later became abuse
the second woman wanted to report rape. i gave my story as testimony to her story and to support her. we stand by the information,says the woman to aftonbladet
**
and looking a few sections up under the heading 'Anser sig utsatt för sexövergrepp/
Considers herself the victim of sexual abuse' we can read that the woman in her 30s considers herself the victim of sexual abuse or molestation but not rape, but another woman(between 20-30) contacted her and told her a similar but worse story
***
as for 'The responsibility for what happened to me and the other girl lies with a man who had attitude problems with women. this line by you, the full section would be translated into
the accusations against Assange is not staged by the pentagon or anybody else. The responsibility for what happened to me and the other girl lies with a man having a skewed view of women and trouble accepting a no
****
Perhaps you would be nice enough to explain why you seem to have been skipping the 'therefore not wanting charges' part of the news in all your postings about this?