General Discussion

emulatorloo

(46,155 posts)

30. The Hill doing their usual "DEMOCRATS IN DISSARY11!!!" Narrative

Reply to DonViejo (Original post)

Fri Jan 4, 2019, 05:23 PM

Jan 2019

This is a big nothing, so of course the Hill and Politico are going to make it a “thing”

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dems call freshman's impeachment remarks 'inappropriate' [View all] DonViejo Jan 2019 OP

Unfortunately, a lot of people suddenly have the F word as part of their basic vocabulary. LisaM Jan 2019 #1

The first lady has naked pictures depicting sex acts Drahthaardogs Jan 2019 #46

I actually have to correct myself on one point. LisaM Jan 2019 #47

Putting kids in cages is inappropriate. Ignoring the Atomwaffen Division is inappropriate. ck4829 Jan 2019 #2

+1 dalton99a Jan 2019 #9

Putting kids in cages predates Trump oberliner Jan 2019 #12

So What? It doesn't make it right. Cha Jan 2019 #16

It also doesn't apply to this discussion Charlotte Little Jan 2019 #18

Choo-choo! Here comes the WH Excuse Train! FSogol Jan 2019 #19

Unreal.. the #whataboutism. Cha Jan 2019 #20

Yup, SSDD. FSogol Jan 2019 #21

lol Cha Jan 2019 #22

The "whataboutism" is saying "what about kids in cages" in response to someone saying MF-er oberliner Jan 2019 #36

Yes, your ##Whataboutism Cha Jan 2019 #38

I don't understand this response oberliner Jan 2019 #39

I understand it. LuckyCharms Jan 2019 #43

Can you clarify? oberliner Jan 2019 #44

Putting kids in cages predates Trump oberliner Jan 2019 #27

This is nonsense Charlotte Little Jan 2019 #17

The media certainly mobilized to get Democrats on the record about swear words, didn't they? gratuitous Jan 2019 #24

They are inappropriate. Ironically some are justifying it by using Trump as the standard for still_one Jan 2019 #3

Cool story, bro. LanternWaste Jan 2019 #4

So are those who supply links ASSUMING THAT IS WHAT SOMEONE IS REFERRING TOO still_one Jan 2019 #7

damn, and me without my pearls to clutch.... KG Jan 2019 #5

It was in a private meeting. Right? underpants Jan 2019 #6

No such thing as a "private meeting" when you're a U.S. Congresswoman in a roomful of people EffieBlack Jan 2019 #8

Completely agree. I drop F bombs, but never MF, give me the creeps. Blue_true Jan 2019 #28

The Hill ... GeorgeGist Jan 2019 #10

Straight from the billionaire's mouth to DU pecosbob Jan 2019 #14

You think The Hill is the only publication quoting Democrats about this? Really? DonViejo Jan 2019 #15

Doesn't make it any less of a RWTP. pecosbob Jan 2019 #23

You're just hell bent on insisting anyone that doesn't agree with you or, has the audacity to DonViejo Jan 2019 #25

No sir I am not pecosbob Jan 2019 #26

You either don't know much about this site or, don't want to know about it, e.g. DonViejo Jan 2019 #29

You posted the article without comment, so most will assume you agree with the Hill's spin emulatorloo Jan 2019 #32

Yawn. I hardly ever post news articles with my own comment included...I post articles... DonViejo Jan 2019 #33

Don't be so defensive, I enjoy your posting of articles emulatorloo Jan 2019 #35

You know it!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2019 #31

We'll all survive. maxsolomon Jan 2019 #11

cheezus IcyPeas Jan 2019 #13

The Hill doing their usual "DEMOCRATS IN DISSARY11!!!" Narrative emulatorloo Jan 2019 #30

Yes, because quiet deference has worked so well in the past. java108 Jan 2019 #34

Gezzus, get over it already! What's next Al Franken type forced resignation by RestoreAmerica2020 Jan 2019 #37

Bullshit... Wounded Bear Jan 2019 #40

She broke through the media's normalization of Trump. She's speaking for millions of Americans. jalan48 Jan 2019 #41

Should have called it "PREMATURE" Liberal In Texas Jan 2019 #42

Gee, I heard Speaker Pelosi comment on this. Sounded QUITE different from The Hill Stinky The Clown Jan 2019 #45