General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The death of Venice? City's battles with tourism and flooding reach crisis level [View all]
A tax on daytrippers has hit the headlines, but La Serenissimas mounting problems also include rising waters, angry locals and a potential black mark from Unesco
Why Italy regrets its Faustian pact with tourist cash
Venices Santa Lucia railway station is packed as visitors scuttle across the concourse towards the water-bus stops. Taking a selfie against the backdrop of the Grand Canal, Ciro Esposito and his girlfriend have just arrived and are unimpressed with what may greet them in future if the Venetian authorities get their way: a minimum city entry fee of 2.50 throughout the year, rising to between 5 and 10 during peak periods.
It is the price of a cappuccino, but for them its going too far. They are using people like a bank machine, says Esposito. We are in Europe and can travel freely across borders, yet we have to pay to enter one of our own cities.
In earlier times it was the wheeled suitcases that tourists rattled over the cobbles that drew the ire of Venetians so much so that the authorities pledged to fine anyone caught using one up to 500. That never happened, but now another more plausible penalty is being concocted. To manage the impact of the 30 million people who visit the lagoon city every year, the daytrippers those who come, take pictures, and leave are to be forced to pay, although it is unclear when the tax will be introduced or how it could be enforced.
Venice may have a centuries-long history of cultivating tourism, devising crowd-drawing events such as the annual carnival, the Biennale international art exhibition and a star-studded film festival, but the advent of mass tourism has left it struggling with how to deal with the near-constant hordes who trudge around its precious sites, through its 11th century basilica, over its famous Rialto bridge, and along its maze of winding calle. The influx is a blessing for the local councils coffers but a scourge on the citys fragile monuments and environment.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/06/venice-losing-fight-with-tourism-and-flooding
-snip-
In a move to allay environmental concerns, Brugnaro tried to indicate to Unesco in late 2017 that he was getting tough on the cruise ships that, weighing more than 96,000 tonnes, disembark thousands of passengers in the heart of the city. They would no longer be able to sail past St Marks Square, he announced, and would instead take a less glamorous route via the industrial area of Marghera.
Environmentalists have claimed that waves caused by the cruise ships have eroded the underwater supports of historic buildings and polluted the waters. But the plan is yet to be approved by the national government. If and when that approval comes, work on the new route, which requires the dredging of canals and construction of a new port, would take an estimated four years. And while diverting the ships would better preserve the historic centre, the move will do little to address concerns about pollution.
It goes without saying, however, that Venices troubles are not limited to tourism. The city is also endangered by recurring acque alte, or high waters. On 29 October last year, three-quarters of the city was hit by the worst flooding in a decade. Rain poured for almost 24 hours, with strong winds raising the water to 156cm above the normal sea level a record reached only five times in the history of the city. As tourists persevered with their holidays wading through knee-deep water in wellies and venturing to deluged shops and restaurants locals counted the cost of the damage.