Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(62,444 posts)

19. See my further comments downthread

Wed Jan 9, 2019, 09:34 AM

Jan 2019

The way this was filed, it would be hard to say that they intended for this information to be leaked

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Or they're setting up the appeal SoCalNative Jan 2019 #1

The redaction error would have nothing to do with that jberryhill Jan 2019 #3

The error doesn't help him with an "ineffective counsel" excuse jberryhill Jan 2019 #10

will Manafort be sanctioned? Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2019 #17

See my further comments downthread jberryhill Jan 2019 #19

Wow, thanks for the explanation. nt Blue_true Jan 2019 #18

No they aren't jberryhill Jan 2019 #2

Do you think this was done intentionally? Mr. Ected Jan 2019 #8

If it was done intentionally jberryhill Jan 2019 #11

Ah, I see. The court 'sanitized' the filing in effect Mr. Ected Jan 2019 #13

Yeah. Lucky break, eh? jberryhill Jan 2019 #15

why? Are they not getting paid? still_one Jan 2019 #4

In otherwords... Xolodno Jan 2019 #5

A secretary just lost job. Sneederbunk Jan 2019 #7

GMTA, was just going to post that. Poor girl. n/t monmouth4 Jan 2019 #9

No jberryhill Jan 2019 #12

Yep jberryhill Jan 2019 #16

Probably a para-legal. Liberal In Texas Jan 2019 #20