Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Obama's little-noticed gift to the USA on his way out the door, in January 2017. [View all]
Just before he left, Obama signed an executive order that made it much easier for the FBI to investigate Trump and his co-conspirators.
Thanks also to Loretta Lynch and James Clapper for their part of this.
These tweets are part of a much longer thread -- the whole thing is worth reading.
Link to tweet
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/us/politics/nsa-gets-more-latitude-to-share-intercepted-communications.html
Jan. 12, 2017
WASHINGTON In its final days, the Obama administration has expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the governments 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.
The new rules significantly relax longstanding limits on what the N.S.A. may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations, which are largely unregulated by American wiretapping laws. These include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches.
The change means that far more officials will be searching through raw data. Essentially, the government is reducing the risk that the N.S.A. will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch signed the new rules, permitting the N.S.A. to disseminate raw signals intelligence information, on Jan. 3, after the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr., signed them on Dec. 15, according to a 23-page, largely declassified copy of the procedures.
The new rules significantly relax longstanding limits on what the N.S.A. may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations, which are largely unregulated by American wiretapping laws. These include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches.
The change means that far more officials will be searching through raw data. Essentially, the government is reducing the risk that the N.S.A. will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch signed the new rules, permitting the N.S.A. to disseminate raw signals intelligence information, on Jan. 3, after the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr., signed them on Dec. 15, according to a 23-page, largely declassified copy of the procedures.
The tweets above are included toward the end of this very long thread, accessible at this link even to those not on Twitter (but you should be). It's all worth reading:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1083931796419563520.html
We dont know what actions that investigation took.
It is fair to assume it included mining ongoing intel from our own resources at the NSA, etc., as well as from allies.
That would have the effect of putting relevant work-product of any allys spying in Muellers hands.
12/
Meaning, even if we werent eavesdropping on Trumps convo w Putin, his late-night phone calls, his admins back-channel contacts with Russians, etc... someone was.
Whether it was the UK, Germany, Estonia, Spain, Israel, Australia or whomever, EVERYONE spies on Russia...
13/
...and Mueller had an open folder just waiting to be filled with whatever tasty
It is fair to assume it included mining ongoing intel from our own resources at the NSA, etc., as well as from allies.
That would have the effect of putting relevant work-product of any allys spying in Muellers hands.
12/
Meaning, even if we werent eavesdropping on Trumps convo w Putin, his late-night phone calls, his admins back-channel contacts with Russians, etc... someone was.
Whether it was the UK, Germany, Estonia, Spain, Israel, Australia or whomever, EVERYONE spies on Russia...
13/
...and Mueller had an open folder just waiting to be filled with whatever tasty
17/
Okay, Im spinning like a top here so let me bring this in for a landing:
Trump has spent the last two years trying to obstruct an investigation into 2016 events...
...and little did he know, his biggest problem would prove to be what he was doing in 2017-2018.
Okay, Im spinning like a top here so let me bring this in for a landing:
Trump has spent the last two years trying to obstruct an investigation into 2016 events...
...and little did he know, his biggest problem would prove to be what he was doing in 2017-2018.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama's little-noticed gift to the USA on his way out the door, in January 2017. [View all]
pnwmom
Jan 2019
OP
That wouldn't have done anything but make the American people feel more helpless
pnwmom
Jan 2019
#42
I think you are right- Consider Giuliani's cell of Hillary-hating FBI'ers feeding him damaging info.
NBachers
Jan 2019
#51
I think maybe today they are waking up to a new reality that thier little
Crutchez_CuiBono
Jan 2019
#45
Right. We have had 5 eyes. The difference now is that the raw data automatically
pnwmom
Jan 2019
#43
I remember that clearly: Biden told us flat-out that no one could walk into a single department...
Hekate
Jan 2019
#48
The irony does not escape me, as my husband and I are rooting for the survival of the FBI...
Hekate
Jan 2019
#49
No, that's not what it says. They are tapping into foreign data streams for counter-intelligence
pnwmom
Jan 2019
#53
tRUMP strategy to debase, diminish and call into question EVERY law enforcement
SayItLoud
Jan 2019
#30
If this is true, why didn't Trump simply revoke that EO, like he did others?
Honeycombe8
Jan 2019
#31
Who would have told him to do so? Someone in his Cabinet full of generals? Other than the generals,
pnwmom
Jan 2019
#47
I think some of those generals were people sent in with the approval of the GOP to keep
pnwmom
Jan 2019
#62
One of the most impossible things to imagine, is to walk in the shoes of the Excutive, the
Ninga
Jan 2019
#38
Remember that at the last minute, Pres. Obama moved Dana Boente lower in the DOJ order of succession
More_Cowbell
Jan 2019
#58