Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LakeSuperiorView

(1,533 posts) Sat Jan 12, 2019, 04:55 PM Jan 2019

Should the State of the Union Address be considered "under oath"? [View all]

We have never had a president that lies constantly like Trump does. His fucking tweets, I can see those being considered informal, so not under oath. But the SOTU Address is the most formal communication the President delivers. Should there not be consequences for lying in this speech?

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should the State of the Union Address be considered "under oath"? [View all] LakeSuperiorView Jan 2019 OP

30 minutes of complete silence? guillaumeb Jan 2019 #1

Members of Congress, distingushed guests, Ladies and Gentlemen, - I plead the fifth. LakeSuperiorView Jan 2019 #3

Perfect. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #4

We expect the truth. But Trump cant help himself. pwb Jan 2019 #2

Maybe Congress should just ask for a written statement Buckeyeblue Jan 2019 #5

We need somebody to pull a Joe Wilson! Va Lefty Jan 2019 #6

On one hand I don't want democrats to behave the way republicans do. johnp3907 Jan 2019 #12

I think it was. It keeps rerunning in my mind all these years later, too. Judi Lynn Jan 2019 #15

Will Putin be in balcony with Melania? nt DURHAM D Jan 2019 #7

No. That's a pretty silly suggestion. PoindexterOglethorpe Jan 2019 #8

Do you have anything to bring to the conversation other than insults? LakeSuperiorView Jan 2019 #9

Sometimes it's just snark. Igel Jan 2019 #10

Thank you Igel. PoindexterOglethorpe Jan 2019 #16

No, of course not. And a SOTU speech isn't even required. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #11

WHY? He's already taken the oath of office,, benld74 Jan 2019 #13

You don't have to be under oath to run afoul of the law. SeattleVet Jan 2019 #14