Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SeattleVet

(5,815 posts)
14. You don't have to be under oath to run afoul of the law.
Sat Jan 12, 2019, 06:52 PM
Jan 2019

"Under the United States Code, title 18, section 1001, a person who knowingly or willingly makes a material statement that is false, or fraudulent, to the feds, is guilty of a crime. What comes as a surprise to many is that unlike section 1621, section 1001 does not require that a person be under oath."

https://blogs.findlaw.com/blotter/2017/03/what-are-the-penalties-for-lying-to-congress.html

I can only imagine what a beautiful sight it would be, seeing him placed into handcuffs and frogmarched off in the middle of the SOTU to be prosecuted for the lies that he was spewing!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should the State of the U...»Reply #14