General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What motivates the outrage over Julian Assange's Political Asylum? [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)conversations with witnesses, and the most important piece of evidence which completely contradicts the story re the 'torn condom', the only actual piece of forensic evidence, provided by the woman herself. I guess she didn't know about DNA. Too bad for the prosecutor.
What you have not provided is the mountain of exculpatory evidence, nor apparently have you read all of the witness testimony or the women's own words now scrubbed from the internet, but fortunately saved before they got to do that.
The reason this case has not been brought to court is because the first prosecutor was correct, there is no case.
There is so much that backs up the women's initial statements, not the later ones which all the evidence, including their own words and witness testimony, contradicts.
Both their lawyer and the prosecution when asked, by REAL journalists how the are going to be able to explain all the huge problems with their 'allegations', they are unable to do so.
But all that has been in the media are the 'allegations' which did not come for months and which the prosecution refused for months to even allow the Defense to see, but were LEAKED to the internet and here you are doing exactly what was expected to be done with them.
Aside from the mountain of exculpatory evidence, which is not what the media spreads around, anyone following it from the beginning and who has read the witness testimony, can plausibly and have, see a very different story emerging.
And after two years of refusing to speak to Assange, refusing to give the 'evidence' to the Defense which they do not have to until charges are filed, so they retain control of the smear campaign as long as they do not file charges, a vast majority of people know what is going on here.
The latest claim that Sweden cannot file charges, even they when asked, have a difficult time making that claim with a straight face.