Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

brush

(61,033 posts)

7. Didn't she just give him a platform to bloviate and avoid answering?

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Sun Jan 13, 2019, 01:14 AM

Jan 2019

And just the tone of her voice in asking the questions signaled to viewers that she thought that question and the follow ups were ridiculous and hardly worthy of asking.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just my opinion, but if "Judge" Pirro felt the need to ask Trump if he was working for the Russians. [View all] brooklynite Jan 2019 OP

It is nice when our side is setting the narrative. :) manor321 Jan 2019 #1

Odd. Judge Pirro is a staunch supporter of t-rump. Iliyah Jan 2019 #2

Why did trump dodge auestion? Gothmog Jan 2019 #3

Of course he didn't answer SCantiGOP Jan 2019 #4

Why not just say "no?" marylandblue Jan 2019 #6

What a strong NO blugbox Jan 2019 #13

She was trying to throw him a softball. drray23 Jan 2019 #5

Thanks for that, drray. Cha Jan 2019 #9

Didn't she just give him a platform to bloviate and avoid answering? brush Jan 2019 #7

yeah, my thought was onethatcares Jan 2019 #12

It will be very interesting when . . . peggysue2 Jan 2019 #8

They say a lawyer shouldn't ask if they don't know the answer Cicada Jan 2019 #10

If he thinks that question was insulting... jmowreader Jan 2019 #11