What motivates the outrage over Julian Assange's Political Asylum?

[reorg]

107. if it is rape

then you should have no problem to cite a similar case but you obviously can't, just like all the others I have asked this question, here and elsewhere.

How do you know "she made it perfectly clear", BTW? Have you been there? The protocol only mentions she had been "nagging" him about condom use. Perfectly possible that he thought she would no longer insist, on the basis of what the interview describes. I mean, what kind of reasoning is this: he was already in me, so there was no point in stopping him? Since when are STD transmitted within the first seconds of contact, how does the risk not increase, the longer the contact lasts? And, especially, since she claims she was also concerned about a pregnancy, since when do you get pregnant from contact with a penis? She could have perfectly well prevented this particular risk while being fully awake, but, according to her own words in the police interview, let this go, too.

What it comes down to is that she was only concerned not to get some disease despite assurances there was no risk.

Only in the Saudi-Arabia of feminism will a prosecutor construe this as rape, and only if the man is not wanted to stay and work in the country, for certain unrelated reasons.