IMO the denial of Sweden to guarantee Assange that he will not be sent to the US is enough to

[sabrina 1]

241. And you are still not posting the evidence that shows that the 'other woman'

emphatically did NOT want to 'report rape'. There is no getting away from that, not just because of her own words, and actions, but the testimony of witnesses.

Not only did she not want to report it, she was so upset when it was reporting in the tabloids, she refused to talk to the police for the second scheduled interview. The woman quoted by you, changed her story three times in the course of a few months. When asked how he is going to deal with the contradictory testimony, their lawyer becomes very defensive but will not explain these very noticeable changes over the months.

And this is why no charges have been filed. The first prosecutor was correct. She saw the most important evidence, before anyone had a chance to tamper with it, and dismissed it.