Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Funtatlaguy

(11,878 posts)
22. I believe this all started in Georgia with Diebold flipping
Wed Jan 16, 2019, 11:42 PM
Jan 2019

Max Cleland.
Lots of smoke and speculation.
But, never proven.

Until a true whistleblower comes forward with a death bed type confession, we will never know the real truth on this issue.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Know who's NOT "bantering"? brooklynite Jan 2019 #1
what's your point? garybeck Jan 2019 #3
My point is that there's no hard evidence of vote hacking... brooklynite Jan 2019 #6
your point is pointless garybeck Jan 2019 #7
+10000 triron Jan 2019 #40
+1,000,000,000,000 THIS!!!!! diva77 Jan 2019 #43
this +10,000,000 nt Baltimike Jan 2019 #44
My brother does hi tech projects for DARPA DFW Jan 2019 #45
You are falling into a dangerous trap that many do: It is not the responsibility of us Amaryllis Jan 2019 #60
In this case, some of us do know better unc70 Jan 2019 #9
and it's not just you. the Brennan Report .... garybeck Jan 2019 #15
these are some of your "bloggers" who say our election system is not secure garybeck Jan 2019 #11
Nothing in "vulnerabilities" equates to evidence of actual hacking... brooklynite Jan 2019 #17
try actually reading something. garybeck Jan 2019 #18
I don't object to point out vulnerabilities... brooklynite Jan 2019 #19
did i ever say that "we lost because the vote was rigged." ? garybeck Jan 2019 #24
"I am hearing more banter lately about the possibility that the actual vote counts were compromised" brooklynite Jan 2019 #25
That's because there *IS* more banter about actual vote hacking Baltimike Jan 2019 #28
and your point is? do you dispute that there is banter? garybeck Jan 2019 #31
THey are. Sen.Ron Wyden has done a lot of work on exposing vendors installing remote access Amaryllis Jan 2019 #59
I support batch scheduling softwares for mainframe and distributed Rene Jan 2019 #54
actually hillary did say after she lost that the country needs paper ballots questionseverything Jan 2019 #57
Electronic Frontier Foundation published a critique of Diebold's (now ES&S) software catrose Jan 2019 #2
there are many many such reports. little if anything is ever done. garybeck Jan 2019 #5
Perfect. Crutchez_CuiBono Jan 2019 #4
that's just the beginning of the story. the other voting machine companies are just as bad. garybeck Jan 2019 #8
I'm picking up what your putting down. Completely agree about the "sim card" Crutchez_CuiBono Jan 2019 #10
bookmark this too garybeck Jan 2019 #12
Wow. Looks good. Thanks for the info. Added to reading list! Crutchez_CuiBono Jan 2019 #13
Thanks for this valuable info - I'm bookmarking your post FakeNoose Jan 2019 #14
K + R Raastan Jan 2019 #16
So what is your solution, assuming at140 Jan 2019 #20
well it starts with admitting there is a problem garybeck Jan 2019 #21
I agree problem exists..what is the solution? at140 Jan 2019 #29
i disagree garybeck Jan 2019 #46
You did not address the issue of multiple voter registrations at140 Jan 2019 #50
You do realize that finding a solution is simply one step in a longer process of critical thought, y LanternWaste Jan 2019 #51
with 50 states allowed to use 50 different type of voting machines at140 Jan 2019 #52
I believe this all started in Georgia with Diebold flipping Funtatlaguy Jan 2019 #22
I interviewed a Diebold whistleblower some years ago Liberty Belle Jan 2019 #36
Certainly Ivanka Trump's patented Chinese voting machines won't be corrupt Blue Owl Jan 2019 #23
Ever since "they" passed HAVA the stats for a red state shift have been overwhelming Botany Jan 2019 #26
Funny how exit polls were always accurate before HAVA. People ask the wrong Amaryllis Jan 2019 #63
Introduced by GOP after 2000 election debacle benld74 Jan 2019 #27
And some of those companies that made the machines *COUGH* Diebold *COUGH*.... Initech Jan 2019 #32
I remember after Bush's second election... Initech Jan 2019 #30
The Wash.Post did that article AFTER I ran this one and won an award for it: Liberty Belle Jan 2019 #35
. JudyM Jan 2019 #41
YAY you! It's such an outrage that this continues to be an issue. deurbano Jan 2019 #53
K & R. Valuable post, TY. appalachiablue Jan 2019 #33
Spot on. I won a national jourmalism award for this 2005 article on the same issue: Liberty Belle Jan 2019 #34
excellent work! ...adding to one of your points... garybeck Jan 2019 #38
Telling the truth, Garybeck. Anon-C Jan 2019 #37
do you need evidence to question the results? garybeck Jan 2019 #39
This is How Republicans Will Cheat to Win in 2020 dlk Jan 2019 #42
SOLUTIONS garybeck Jan 2019 #47
There is no computerized solution. Hand counted paper ballots at precinct level with diva77 Jan 2019 #49
i disagree garybeck Jan 2019 #58
unfortunately, audits can be rigged -- they may appear to be random when in reality they aren't diva77 Jan 2019 #62
REcommend everyone sign up for their email list and support them. They have been doing Amaryllis Jan 2019 #64
paper ballots, counted by people Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2019 #48
this. nt Baltimike Jan 2019 #55
+1,000 This!! diva77 Jan 2019 #56
More to support your point: Amaryllis Jan 2019 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's the voting machines,...»Reply #22