General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Last edited Thu Jan 17, 2019, 09:57 AM - Edit history (3)
And the Democratic party didn't have those progressive ides "cemented" as firmly "in the Party's dialogue with the GOP."
Indeed, that is a 'belief.'
My activist friends and I have stances and talk about inequality, corporate corruption, greed, and universal health care. I expect more from a legislator. Don't you?
I'll take results over angry speeches in measuring progressive achievements.
CHIP and the ACA, along with funding Planned Parenthood are Democratic Party progressive "results" in healthcare access. The Democratic Party Lilly Ledbetter Equal Pay Act is a "result" of progressive legislating against inequality. Dodd Frank is an achievement in reigning in Wall Street - by two who took donations from Wall Street. McCain Feingold is an acheivement in campaign finance reform. Hillary Clinton got first responders health care coverage
John Lewis has delivered progressive results, before and during his political career. Hillary Clinton has delivered results in progressive results, before, during and after her political career. Barney Frank, Ted Kennedy, Paul Wellstone - they are examples of effective progressive legislators that did far, far more than take stances, or go on talk shows.
That is what I am talking about in terms of "accomplishing" things for progressive causes, and they are all Democrats. Democrats have been cementing progressive accomplishments and dialogue since before Sanders had a political career.
Not sure how these actual votes are progressive:
2012 - Maginsky Act - Nay
2014 - Russia Sanctions - Nay
2017 - Russia Sanctions - Nay (twice)
2019 - Russia Sanctions - "Busy" at a meeting that he scheduled for the time of the vote.
Or this:
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/24/bernie-sanders-russian-trolls-false-story-423413