Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)249. Mea Culpa. Thanks for the clarification!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
253 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This was a super critical vote for our national security and he couldn't be bothered.
lark
Jan 2019
#6
To be fair, judging from his voting record, we could predict what it would be...
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#251
Yes. He was at that hearing with other Democratic Senators and republican Senators....
George II
Jan 2019
#32
He dropped by the all day meeting for 1hr. And if he was worried about "how they felt"
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#220
The meetings "stretched for a full day" and BS met his campaign's victims for one hour,
lapucelle
Jan 2019
#243
Now that we know votes aren't important, glad we won't be hearing about anyone's Iraq vote again!
betsuni
Jan 2019
#210
It may well be he was at the meeting being held to confront issues from his 2016 campaign
Tom Rinaldo
Jan 2019
#9
His #1 responsibility is to vote... especially on national security matters like this.
scheming daemons
Jan 2019
#12
The meeting began after the Senate vote. He still found time to hold a press conference at 2 PM.
George II
Jan 2019
#35
Reporters said that he entered the meeting shortly before 1:00 PM, the vote was taking place....
George II
Jan 2019
#127
Considering the previous votes on Russian sanctions, others are wondering aloud...
NurseJackie
Jan 2019
#132
One extra vote would have put us at 58. Might have helped to sway two more votes.
NurseJackie
Jan 2019
#76
And apparently the meeting started after the vote, despite what the spokesperson said.
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#199
To be clear, I voted for him in the primary and Clinton in the general. I don't want either in '20.
DRoseDARs
Jan 2019
#195
Clearly any mention of inconsistencies or not measuring up to the standards that he and his
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#202
A) His vote is a statement on where he stands B) He could take 5 minutes away from meeting to vote
scheming daemons
Jan 2019
#17
Missing a vote because he was handling a problem with his campaign is NOT acceptable
EffieBlack
Jan 2019
#23
It wouldn't be acceptable for any Democrat to miss that vote, especially any who are planning a 2020
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#29
Gillibrand made it to vote, even with a POTUS campaign event in upstate NY today.(nt)
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#64
Yes all the other Democratic Senator and Senator King were able to vote. There is no excuse....
George II
Jan 2019
#38
Two reasons ONLY to miss this - Two, not three, not one, not four ... ---2
Eliot Rosewater
Jan 2019
#134
It was a tight vote, undecided until the last minute and it failed by only two (plus his) votes.
George II
Jan 2019
#95
+1, this is it ... I wouldn't be shocked or surprised if he did and didn't know it and now doesn't
uponit7771
Jan 2019
#45
Yes, she missed the vote on a motion to proceed, which required a simple majority....
George II
Jan 2019
#40
Jus wow ... seems like everyone against HRC in 16 was working for the Russians in some way. 3 Times
uponit7771
Jan 2019
#56
Gosh...I feel the same way about DEMOCRATS. Especially the lady who won.
Crutchez_CuiBono
Jan 2019
#107
Now you are being too controversial, how DARE You show support for Hillary
Eliot Rosewater
Jan 2019
#141
He has stances on progressive ideas and greed, & that is "doing things for" progressive causes.
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#248
This is why the left LOSES, because they can't resist attacking each other. Duh!
pdsimdars
Jan 2019
#135
You mean like Bernie and his "revolution" attacking the Democratic Party every opportunity they get?
MrsCoffee
Jan 2019
#212
The vote that she missed was a motion to proceed, which advanced the bill to today's....
George II
Jan 2019
#147
My concern is 2020. What will happen when the relentless attack of WHOEVER
Eliot Rosewater
Jan 2019
#146
It is a big deal if it addresses concerns of your supposed constituents. The question is who are his
PSPS
Jan 2019
#79
Good question. Vermont newspaper editorial boards have also inquired on that subject.
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#155
So that's supposed to excuse any absence of a Senator on a vote? "All of them have missed votes?"
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#113
The reason being saying that they were busy in a meeting that didn't start until after the vote?
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#205
It's reasonable to look at someone's voting history with regard to Russian sanctions...
NurseJackie
Jan 2019
#138
Especially when it was discovered that Russia was promoting him as a candidate?
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#149
We know all their records: all of the Democrats voted no - along with some GOP.
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#226
I give up, you carry on bashing Democrats. I will continue my efforts at bashing republicans. (EOM)
tiredtoo
Jan 2019
#176
But since you brought up Franken, here's Sen Sanders' own statement on Franken:
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#178
Bernie: "The right thing is for him to resign". I wonder if you'll get a response? n/t
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2019
#223
And yet example after example of real problems with the guy and the same people
Eliot Rosewater
Jan 2019
#151
Nope... I am against ANY Senator that votes to help Russian Oligarchs (or doesn't vote to stop them)
scheming daemons
Jan 2019
#92
Hell no, Taking action or no action to help Russian oligarchs by any means is screwed up
uponit7771
Jan 2019
#218
Wrong! I hope you'll be big enough to apologize to Sen. Gillibrand, but I won't hold my breath.
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2019
#224
His spokesperson said it was because he was meeting with the victims of his campaign
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#99
Much can be revealed by looking at one's previous voting record on Russian sanctions.
NurseJackie
Jan 2019
#104
Looking at the previous voting record on Russian sanctions was a big clue too.
NurseJackie
Jan 2019
#106
@SenGillibrand changed her campaign kickoff schedule to return to DC for a cloture vote
Gothmog
Jan 2019
#137
We need the names of the Russian sympathizers and traitors to America.
democratisphere
Jan 2019
#159
Maybe he was "busy making the case" . . . . like he was when his female staffers needed his help.
Stinky The Clown
Jan 2019
#174
"Trumpers?" Because someone pointed out some interesting patterns in the voting of
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#228
"Who is Bernie working for?" Not the oligarchs, regardless of which party they donate to.
TSheehan
Jan 2019
#215
Then why did he take positive actions towards them and their money so many times? tia
uponit7771
Jan 2019
#219