Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)250. He makes time, however to take his family to Rome.
And travel to the South get in front of crowds with candidates that didn't want to be associated with him.
https://apnews.com/99afaea472f8482fa71ef025b764867f
And have a "Gathering" but no time to reach out or even send an email to the victims of gender pay inequity and sexual harassment when he had been told about the systemic problems with his male staffers in early 2017.
Busy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
253 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This was a super critical vote for our national security and he couldn't be bothered.
lark
Jan 2019
#6
To be fair, judging from his voting record, we could predict what it would be...
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#251
Yes. He was at that hearing with other Democratic Senators and republican Senators....
George II
Jan 2019
#32
He dropped by the all day meeting for 1hr. And if he was worried about "how they felt"
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#220
The meetings "stretched for a full day" and BS met his campaign's victims for one hour,
lapucelle
Jan 2019
#243
Now that we know votes aren't important, glad we won't be hearing about anyone's Iraq vote again!
betsuni
Jan 2019
#210
It may well be he was at the meeting being held to confront issues from his 2016 campaign
Tom Rinaldo
Jan 2019
#9
His #1 responsibility is to vote... especially on national security matters like this.
scheming daemons
Jan 2019
#12
The meeting began after the Senate vote. He still found time to hold a press conference at 2 PM.
George II
Jan 2019
#35
Reporters said that he entered the meeting shortly before 1:00 PM, the vote was taking place....
George II
Jan 2019
#127
Considering the previous votes on Russian sanctions, others are wondering aloud...
NurseJackie
Jan 2019
#132
One extra vote would have put us at 58. Might have helped to sway two more votes.
NurseJackie
Jan 2019
#76
And apparently the meeting started after the vote, despite what the spokesperson said.
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#199
To be clear, I voted for him in the primary and Clinton in the general. I don't want either in '20.
DRoseDARs
Jan 2019
#195
Clearly any mention of inconsistencies or not measuring up to the standards that he and his
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#202
A) His vote is a statement on where he stands B) He could take 5 minutes away from meeting to vote
scheming daemons
Jan 2019
#17
Missing a vote because he was handling a problem with his campaign is NOT acceptable
EffieBlack
Jan 2019
#23
It wouldn't be acceptable for any Democrat to miss that vote, especially any who are planning a 2020
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#29
Gillibrand made it to vote, even with a POTUS campaign event in upstate NY today.(nt)
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#64
Yes all the other Democratic Senator and Senator King were able to vote. There is no excuse....
George II
Jan 2019
#38
Two reasons ONLY to miss this - Two, not three, not one, not four ... ---2
Eliot Rosewater
Jan 2019
#134
It was a tight vote, undecided until the last minute and it failed by only two (plus his) votes.
George II
Jan 2019
#95
+1, this is it ... I wouldn't be shocked or surprised if he did and didn't know it and now doesn't
uponit7771
Jan 2019
#45
Yes, she missed the vote on a motion to proceed, which required a simple majority....
George II
Jan 2019
#40
Jus wow ... seems like everyone against HRC in 16 was working for the Russians in some way. 3 Times
uponit7771
Jan 2019
#56
Gosh...I feel the same way about DEMOCRATS. Especially the lady who won.
Crutchez_CuiBono
Jan 2019
#107
Now you are being too controversial, how DARE You show support for Hillary
Eliot Rosewater
Jan 2019
#141
He has stances on progressive ideas and greed, & that is "doing things for" progressive causes.
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#248
This is why the left LOSES, because they can't resist attacking each other. Duh!
pdsimdars
Jan 2019
#135
You mean like Bernie and his "revolution" attacking the Democratic Party every opportunity they get?
MrsCoffee
Jan 2019
#212
The vote that she missed was a motion to proceed, which advanced the bill to today's....
George II
Jan 2019
#147
My concern is 2020. What will happen when the relentless attack of WHOEVER
Eliot Rosewater
Jan 2019
#146
It is a big deal if it addresses concerns of your supposed constituents. The question is who are his
PSPS
Jan 2019
#79
Good question. Vermont newspaper editorial boards have also inquired on that subject.
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#155
So that's supposed to excuse any absence of a Senator on a vote? "All of them have missed votes?"
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#113
The reason being saying that they were busy in a meeting that didn't start until after the vote?
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#205
It's reasonable to look at someone's voting history with regard to Russian sanctions...
NurseJackie
Jan 2019
#138
Especially when it was discovered that Russia was promoting him as a candidate?
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#149
We know all their records: all of the Democrats voted no - along with some GOP.
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#226
I give up, you carry on bashing Democrats. I will continue my efforts at bashing republicans. (EOM)
tiredtoo
Jan 2019
#176
But since you brought up Franken, here's Sen Sanders' own statement on Franken:
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#178
Bernie: "The right thing is for him to resign". I wonder if you'll get a response? n/t
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2019
#223
And yet example after example of real problems with the guy and the same people
Eliot Rosewater
Jan 2019
#151
Nope... I am against ANY Senator that votes to help Russian Oligarchs (or doesn't vote to stop them)
scheming daemons
Jan 2019
#92
Hell no, Taking action or no action to help Russian oligarchs by any means is screwed up
uponit7771
Jan 2019
#218
Wrong! I hope you'll be big enough to apologize to Sen. Gillibrand, but I won't hold my breath.
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2019
#224
His spokesperson said it was because he was meeting with the victims of his campaign
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#99
Much can be revealed by looking at one's previous voting record on Russian sanctions.
NurseJackie
Jan 2019
#104
Looking at the previous voting record on Russian sanctions was a big clue too.
NurseJackie
Jan 2019
#106
@SenGillibrand changed her campaign kickoff schedule to return to DC for a cloture vote
Gothmog
Jan 2019
#137
We need the names of the Russian sympathizers and traitors to America.
democratisphere
Jan 2019
#159
Maybe he was "busy making the case" . . . . like he was when his female staffers needed his help.
Stinky The Clown
Jan 2019
#174
"Trumpers?" Because someone pointed out some interesting patterns in the voting of
ehrnst
Jan 2019
#228
"Who is Bernie working for?" Not the oligarchs, regardless of which party they donate to.
TSheehan
Jan 2019
#215
Then why did he take positive actions towards them and their money so many times? tia
uponit7771
Jan 2019
#219