General Discussion

Amaryllis

(11,321 posts)

61. More to support your point:

Thu Jan 17, 2019, 09:10 PM

Jan 2019

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/37486-the-shocking-truth-about-election-rigging-in-america
THe Shocking Truth about Election Rigging in America
Published just before teh 2016 election.

"If there is anything positive to say about the 2016 elections, it’s that they have finally forced an end to the official denial of computerized election rigging. In the past month, the fact that our voting technology is a hacker’s paradise has been validated by no less than all the major TV news networks: NBC, ABC, CBS, Reuters, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Boston Globe, The Atlantic, USA Today, The Hill, The Guardian, Mother Jones, Politico, and a dozen other outlets."
Lots more at link.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It's the voting machines, stupid. [View all] garybeck Jan 2019 OP

Know who's NOT "bantering"? brooklynite Jan 2019 #1

what's your point? garybeck Jan 2019 #3

My point is that there's no hard evidence of vote hacking... brooklynite Jan 2019 #6

your point is pointless garybeck Jan 2019 #7

+10000 triron Jan 2019 #40

+1,000,000,000,000 THIS!!!!! diva77 Jan 2019 #43

this +10,000,000 nt Baltimike Jan 2019 #44

My brother does hi tech projects for DARPA DFW Jan 2019 #45

You are falling into a dangerous trap that many do: It is not the responsibility of us Amaryllis Jan 2019 #60

In this case, some of us do know better unc70 Jan 2019 #9

and it's not just you. the Brennan Report .... garybeck Jan 2019 #15

these are some of your "bloggers" who say our election system is not secure garybeck Jan 2019 #11

Nothing in "vulnerabilities" equates to evidence of actual hacking... brooklynite Jan 2019 #17

try actually reading something. garybeck Jan 2019 #18

I don't object to point out vulnerabilities... brooklynite Jan 2019 #19

did i ever say that "we lost because the vote was rigged." ? garybeck Jan 2019 #24

"I am hearing more banter lately about the possibility that the actual vote counts were compromised" brooklynite Jan 2019 #25

That's because there *IS* more banter about actual vote hacking Baltimike Jan 2019 #28

and your point is? do you dispute that there is banter? garybeck Jan 2019 #31

THey are. Sen.Ron Wyden has done a lot of work on exposing vendors installing remote access Amaryllis Jan 2019 #59

I support batch scheduling softwares for mainframe and distributed Rene Jan 2019 #54

actually hillary did say after she lost that the country needs paper ballots questionseverything Jan 2019 #57

Electronic Frontier Foundation published a critique of Diebold's (now ES&S) software catrose Jan 2019 #2

there are many many such reports. little if anything is ever done. garybeck Jan 2019 #5

Perfect. Crutchez_CuiBono Jan 2019 #4

that's just the beginning of the story. the other voting machine companies are just as bad. garybeck Jan 2019 #8

I'm picking up what your putting down. Completely agree about the "sim card" Crutchez_CuiBono Jan 2019 #10

bookmark this too garybeck Jan 2019 #12

Wow. Looks good. Thanks for the info. Added to reading list! Crutchez_CuiBono Jan 2019 #13

Thanks for this valuable info - I'm bookmarking your post FakeNoose Jan 2019 #14

K + R Raastan Jan 2019 #16

So what is your solution, assuming at140 Jan 2019 #20

well it starts with admitting there is a problem garybeck Jan 2019 #21

I agree problem exists..what is the solution? at140 Jan 2019 #29

i disagree garybeck Jan 2019 #46

You did not address the issue of multiple voter registrations at140 Jan 2019 #50

You do realize that finding a solution is simply one step in a longer process of critical thought, y LanternWaste Jan 2019 #51

with 50 states allowed to use 50 different type of voting machines at140 Jan 2019 #52

I believe this all started in Georgia with Diebold flipping Funtatlaguy Jan 2019 #22

I interviewed a Diebold whistleblower some years ago Liberty Belle Jan 2019 #36

Certainly Ivanka Trump's patented Chinese voting machines won't be corrupt Blue Owl Jan 2019 #23

Ever since "they" passed HAVA the stats for a red state shift have been overwhelming Botany Jan 2019 #26

Funny how exit polls were always accurate before HAVA. People ask the wrong Amaryllis Jan 2019 #63

Introduced by GOP after 2000 election debacle benld74 Jan 2019 #27

And some of those companies that made the machines *COUGH* Diebold *COUGH*.... Initech Jan 2019 #32

I remember after Bush's second election... Initech Jan 2019 #30

The Wash.Post did that article AFTER I ran this one and won an award for it: Liberty Belle Jan 2019 #35

. JudyM Jan 2019 #41

YAY you! It's such an outrage that this continues to be an issue. deurbano Jan 2019 #53

K & R. Valuable post, TY. appalachiablue Jan 2019 #33

Spot on. I won a national jourmalism award for this 2005 article on the same issue: Liberty Belle Jan 2019 #34

excellent work! ...adding to one of your points... garybeck Jan 2019 #38

Telling the truth, Garybeck. Anon-C Jan 2019 #37

do you need evidence to question the results? garybeck Jan 2019 #39

This is How Republicans Will Cheat to Win in 2020 dlk Jan 2019 #42

SOLUTIONS garybeck Jan 2019 #47

There is no computerized solution. Hand counted paper ballots at precinct level with diva77 Jan 2019 #49

i disagree garybeck Jan 2019 #58

unfortunately, audits can be rigged -- they may appear to be random when in reality they aren't diva77 Jan 2019 #62

REcommend everyone sign up for their email list and support them. They have been doing Amaryllis Jan 2019 #64

paper ballots, counted by people Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2019 #48

this. nt Baltimike Jan 2019 #55

+1,000 This!! diva77 Jan 2019 #56

More to support your point: Amaryllis Jan 2019 #61