Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: That smug Kentucky teen harassing Nathan Phillips will become an iconic photograph of the Trump [View all]tblue37
(68,460 posts)6. Here is an excerpt from an article about them:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2011/10/elizabeth-eckford-and-hazel-bryan-what-happened-to-the-two-girls-in-the-most-famous-photo-of-the-civil-rights-era.html
snip
. . . Two years after theyd first met, the pair even appeared on Oprah. Winfrey hadnt bothered hiding her incredulity, even disdain, that day: Of all people, these two were now friends? But as rude as both felt her to have been, shed been on to something. The improbable relationship had already begun to unravel.
A student of, and stickler for, history, Elizabeth looked forand, she thought, spottedholes in Hazels story. How, for instance, could Hazel have undertaken something so cruel so casually, then remembered so little about it afterward? And why, after all these years, did she absolve her parents from any blame? At their joint appearances, Elizabeth could treat Hazel impatiently, peremptorily. Meantime, others in the Little Rock Nine either shunned Hazel or complained of her presence at various commemorations.
But resentment came as well from whites, particularly whites whod attended Central, particularly those from better families, whod thought that, even by always looking the other way, theyd done absolutely nothing wrong during those dark days and, truth be told, considered Hazel and her ilk white trash. Forty years earlier shed given them all a black eye; now, she was back, more conspicuous, and embarrassing, than ever. At a reunion she foolishly, or naively, attended, she felt their cold shoulder, and could hear their snickers. None of them had ever apologized for anything theyd done or not done, and, as far as Hazel could tell, theyd been none the worse for their silence.
Ultimately, it grew too much for Hazel. She cut off ties with Elizabethfor her, Sept. 11, 2011, marked another anniversary: 10 years had passed since theyd last spokenand stopped making public appearances with her. Her interviews with megranted only with great reluctancewill, she says, be her last. When I asked the two women to pose together one last time (Elizabeth turned 70 last Tuesday; Hazel will in January) Elizabeth agreed; Hazel would not. Hazel was poised to vote for Obama in 2008; after all, even her own mother did. But so deep was her hurt that she found some excuse not to.
So the famous photograph of 1957 takes on additional meaning: the continuing chasm between the races and the great difficulty, even among people of good will, to pull off real racial reconciliation. But shuttling back and forth between them, I could see that for all their harsh wordsover the past decade, theyve only dug in their heelsthey still missed one another. Each, I noticed, teared up at references to the other. Perhaps, when no one is lookingor taking any picturestheyll yet come together again. And if they can, maybe, so too, can we.
. . . Two years after theyd first met, the pair even appeared on Oprah. Winfrey hadnt bothered hiding her incredulity, even disdain, that day: Of all people, these two were now friends? But as rude as both felt her to have been, shed been on to something. The improbable relationship had already begun to unravel.
A student of, and stickler for, history, Elizabeth looked forand, she thought, spottedholes in Hazels story. How, for instance, could Hazel have undertaken something so cruel so casually, then remembered so little about it afterward? And why, after all these years, did she absolve her parents from any blame? At their joint appearances, Elizabeth could treat Hazel impatiently, peremptorily. Meantime, others in the Little Rock Nine either shunned Hazel or complained of her presence at various commemorations.
But resentment came as well from whites, particularly whites whod attended Central, particularly those from better families, whod thought that, even by always looking the other way, theyd done absolutely nothing wrong during those dark days and, truth be told, considered Hazel and her ilk white trash. Forty years earlier shed given them all a black eye; now, she was back, more conspicuous, and embarrassing, than ever. At a reunion she foolishly, or naively, attended, she felt their cold shoulder, and could hear their snickers. None of them had ever apologized for anything theyd done or not done, and, as far as Hazel could tell, theyd been none the worse for their silence.
Ultimately, it grew too much for Hazel. She cut off ties with Elizabethfor her, Sept. 11, 2011, marked another anniversary: 10 years had passed since theyd last spokenand stopped making public appearances with her. Her interviews with megranted only with great reluctancewill, she says, be her last. When I asked the two women to pose together one last time (Elizabeth turned 70 last Tuesday; Hazel will in January) Elizabeth agreed; Hazel would not. Hazel was poised to vote for Obama in 2008; after all, even her own mother did. But so deep was her hurt that she found some excuse not to.
So the famous photograph of 1957 takes on additional meaning: the continuing chasm between the races and the great difficulty, even among people of good will, to pull off real racial reconciliation. But shuttling back and forth between them, I could see that for all their harsh wordsover the past decade, theyve only dug in their heelsthey still missed one another. Each, I noticed, teared up at references to the other. Perhaps, when no one is lookingor taking any picturestheyll yet come together again. And if they can, maybe, so too, can we.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That smug Kentucky teen harassing Nathan Phillips will become an iconic photograph of the Trump [View all]
tblue37
Jan 2019
OP
The young lady who was yelling @ the African American woman is now one of her best friends
Botany
Jan 2019
#3
They tried to reconcile, but after a while (and some joint public appearances) that
tblue37
Jan 2019
#4
Like in 1957, the mother is defending him tooth and nail and saying 'fake news'
dalton99a
Jan 2019
#5
She is also claiming that Nathan Phillips was the aggressor, deliberately drumming right up
tblue37
Jan 2019
#8
His teaching moment will be this photo following him around for the rest of his life.
Vinca
Jan 2019
#13
All those smug, leering & jeering little MAGAts in the background are just as bad.
catbyte
Jan 2019
#22