Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: At Kirsten Gillibran's exploratory committee facebook page, it looks like 9 out of 10 comments are [View all]wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)2. Just the facts. If it gets hid because I reported the facts so be it
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
165 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
At Kirsten Gillibran's exploratory committee facebook page, it looks like 9 out of 10 comments are [View all]
wasupaloopa
Jan 2019
OP
Just because you're not happy with the result doesn't mean it shouldn't be mentioned.
BannonsLiver
Jan 2019
#6
Sure looks that way. And the self righteousness which some are doing that to her enrages me. nt
Blue_true
Jan 2019
#36
You can be on the forefront and also be in favor of giving the accused a fair investigation.
BlueStater
Jan 2019
#35
I'm not going to argue this anymore. It's over. She did the wrong thing. There was NO EVIDENCE.
Honeycombe8
Jan 2019
#127
As fair as the investigation they gave Menendez, who actually was tried criminally for fraud.
Honeycombe8
Jan 2019
#113
Gillibrand was the face of the movement to oust Franken. She is proud of it.
Honeycombe8
Jan 2019
#121
Nope. In interview, she was introduced as "the face of the ouster of Franken...."
Honeycombe8
Jan 2019
#124
I'm not going to respond further to your attempts to excuse her wrongful actions against Franken.
Honeycombe8
Jan 2019
#129
Placed on ignore for hounding me repeatedly, saying the same thing over and over. Geez. nt
Honeycombe8
Jan 2019
#132
Some on DU doesn't want to hear the fact that there many Senators calling on Franken to resign.
Blue_true
Jan 2019
#135
44 out of 49 said he should go, either in public or private, and four of the other five were legally
Celerity
Jan 2019
#164
He had to leave when Schumer joined Gillibrand, and she got others to jump on bandwagon.
Honeycombe8
Jan 2019
#114
McCarthy weilded the same type of "influence"; many of us don't desire that in a President
LongtimeAZDem
Jan 2019
#156
Look it is going to be a long campaign season. Thousands of people are going to say what I did.
wasupaloopa
Jan 2019
#12
We shouldn't go after any Dem who pushed for his resignation & that list is long
mastermind
Jan 2019
#70
Look I get it...but let's move on...not worth the risk...we all know what happened some
Demsrule86
Jan 2019
#89
Biden is the one....My opinioin is he is the best candidate, most experienced, most respected, and
Stuart G
Jan 2019
#8
And he has the va va voom that we need at the top of the ticket. It is a popularity contest...
UniteFightBack
Jan 2019
#21
As someone who is objective on this matter I agree..I think the serious Harris would be a
UniteFightBack
Jan 2019
#23
Gets what message? That she should undo Franken's departure? Fascinating that...
TreasonousBastard
Jan 2019
#14
"Fascinating that every time Gillibrand's name comes up, some one associates her with Franken."
Scurrilous
Jan 2019
#33
She may get the message that there are a lot of bullies going to her website.
SharonClark
Jan 2019
#19
Gillibrand was one of the leaders of the attack. She asked for this when she made that decision. nt
USALiberal
Jan 2019
#39
Then it is likely you will won't be voting for the Democratic candidate.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jan 2019
#160
She probably understands that her leading against Franken will cost her a shot this cycle.
FreepFryer
Jan 2019
#45
She WAS the first, she also said Clinton should have resigned over Monica. nt
USALiberal
Jan 2019
#60
So what that she was the first ... if she wasn't, somebody else would have been
SFnomad
Jan 2019
#69
There is no doubt ... and soon as the blue dress materialized, it would have been over
SFnomad
Jan 2019
#75
Part of what saved Clinton was the unsavoriness of and unlikeability of his enemies.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jan 2019
#79
Yeah ... start out investigating a failed property deal ... and wind up obsessing over
SFnomad
Jan 2019
#90
Plenty of reasons to dislike her. At one point, NRA "A" rating. Defended big tobacco. nt
USALiberal
Jan 2019
#76
She didn't just offer President Clinton up on a plate ... she was specifically asked
SFnomad
Jan 2019
#78
It was a 20 year old issue. That is the excuse. No need to revisit. But she choose to. Hmmmm. nt
USALiberal
Jan 2019
#136
Sen. Franken didn't get the party support he deserved, I wish he would have stuck it out
mastermind
Jan 2019
#68
When judging online comments this cycle remember that Russia is working hard to divide us, again
TeamPooka
Jan 2019
#84
Doesn't look that way to me. But I block idiots on facebook so YMMV there. nt
fleabiscuit
Jan 2019
#107