General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: At Kirsten Gillibran's exploratory committee facebook page, it looks like 9 out of 10 comments are [View all]Blue_true
(31,261 posts)A woman who has been on the forefront on sexual harassment and violence gets ripped to threads and accused of being THE driving force for Franken resigning (I still can't figure out why someone that make that claim don't realize that if she is that influential, she should be President). But a guy who well could have ignored aggressive sexual harassment as well as pay discrepancies get every excuse made for him as to why he was not on top of those problems.
Nothing to see here, it is just the typical stuff of some men grabbing for their gonads when a women that threaten their sense of manhood walks into the room. I am willing to bet that all the negative comments left on Gillibrand's site were written by men. If she makes her case as to why she should be President, I have no hesitancy in voting for her in the primary, and if she wins that, supporting her 100% from then on.